|
|
The Logic of Operation and Generation Mechanism on the Mode of the Poverty Alleviation Workshop |
HE Yang |
Institute of National Politics, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091 |
|
|
Abstract The poverty alleviation workshop is an innovative practice of local government to help poor households out of poverty and become better off through employment. Based on the poverty alleviation workshop model in J County, this paper presents an analytical framework of value integration, resource integration, information integration and interest integration from the perspective of cooperative governance, and explores the operation logic and generation mechanism of the poverty alleviation workshop model. The study reveals that the poverty alleviation workshop mode is the result of the joint efforts of the government, enterprises, villagers' committees and poor households. With the support of the government and villagers' committees, enterprises set up workshops in villages, recruiting non-poor households to maintain the normal operation of the workshops and attract poor households to work there, so as to help poor households achieve stable income growth. The poverty alleviation workshops are close to the villagers' homes, flexible in working hours, lax in job requirements, and labor-intensive. The emerging of the poverty alleviation workshop model results from many efforts of the government, enterprises, and villagers committees such as their insistence on the equality and autonomy of cooperators, the formation of resource absorption mechanism, the establishment of information communication mechanism, and the generation of the benefit sharing mechanism for cooperators. In this way, the cooperators realize the organic integration of value, resources, information and interests, and thus establish a symbiotic relationship. In the future, we should pay attention to the vulnerability of the benefit sharing mechanism of cooperators, promote the normalization of the poverty alleviation workshop model which emerged in a special period, and forge a close connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization.
|
Received: 19 May 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 袁方成,李思航.技术治理的风险及其演化逻辑——以农村精准扶贫为分析对象[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(2):45-61. [2] 汪三贵,郭子豪.论中国的精准扶贫[J].贵州社会科学,2015,(5):147-150. [3] 庞庆明,周方.产业扶贫时代意义、内在矛盾及其保障体系构建[J].贵州社会科学,2019,(1):149-153. [4] 郭晓鸣,廖祖君,张耀文.产业链嵌入式扶贫:企业参与扶贫的一个选择——来自铁骑力士集团“1+8”扶贫实践的例证[J].农村经济,2018,(7):1-8. [5] 李冬慧. 基于治理资源视角的产业扶贫与贫困治理——以陕西省延长县X村为例[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(6):52-58. [6] 张琦,张涛,贺胜年.供给侧改革视角下民族地区产业精准扶贫的路径探索[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2019,(1):97-104. [7] 李博. 项目制扶贫的运作逻辑与地方性实践——以精准扶贫视角看A县竞争性扶贫项目[J].北京社会科学,2016,(3):106-112. [8] 靳永翥,丁照攀.精准扶贫战略背景下项目制减贫绩效的影响因素研究——基于武陵山、乌蒙山、滇桂黔三大集中连片特困地区的调查分析[J].公共行政评论,2017,(3):46-70. [9] 王雨磊.项目入户:农村精准扶贫中项目制运作新趋向[J].行政论坛,2018,(5):45-53. [10] 何阳,汤志伟.扶贫车间可持续发展:企业性质转换与行为激励[J].地方治理研究,2019,(4):50-65. [11] Emerson,K.,Nabatchi,T.,Balogh S.An Integrated Framework for Collaborative Governance[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2012,(1):1-29. [12] Tang,S.J.,Mazmanian,D.A.An Agenda for the Study of Collaborative Governance[R].Los Anglos:University of Southern California Working Paper,2008. [13] 张康之. 论参与治理、社会自治与合作治理[J].行政论坛,2008,(6):1-6. [14] 蔡岚. 缓解地方政府合作困境的合作治理框架构想——以长株潭公交一体化为例[J].公共管理学报,2010,(4):31-38. [15] 王辉. 合作治理的中国适用性及限度[J].华中科技大学学报 (社会科学版),2014,(6):11-20. [16] 黄建伟,刘军.社会治理变革中的合作治理:辨析、建构与展望[J].湖南社会科学,2019,(1):32-40. [17] 张康之. 论合作治理中行动者的独立性[J].学术月刊,2017,(7):68-77. [18] 何阳,孙萍.精准扶贫第三方评估流程再造:理论依据、现实动因与政策设计——对民族地区精准扶贫第三方评估实践的反思[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2018,(5):177-183. [19] 范玉刚. 乡村文化复兴与乡土文明价值重构[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,(6):3-13. [20] 杜永红. 乡村振兴战略背景下网络扶贫与电子商务进农村研究[J].求实,2019,(3):97-108. |
|
|
|