|
|
|
| Staying in First-tier Cities or not: the Choice of the New Generation of White-collar Migrants and its Influence Mechanism |
| ZHU Hao |
| College of Political Science and Public Administration, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 201620 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the dynamic monitored data of the floating population in 2016, this paper studies the factors influencing the choice of the new generation of white-collar migrants to stay in cities, and also explores the decision-making mechanism for their choice to stay in first-tier cities or not. The study shows that currently the new generation of white-collar migrants generally have a strong desire to stay in cities, and 80% of them plan to live in the city they have moved to for a long time. As far as first-tier cities are concerned, housing (especially whether they have purchased a home or not) and household registration plays an important role in the decision of the new generation of white-collar migrants. In the non-first-tier cities, many social network factors and institutional factors play a decisive role. This, to some extent, can explain why white-collar workers choose to move to or retreat from the first-tier cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. To make the new generation of white-collar migrants more willing to stay and settle in the city, we need to further improve and perfect family policies, bring down migration cost, and encourage family migration. The government should optimize public services in housing, education, employment, attach more importance to the reform of the household registration system, and offer more favorable policies to white-collar workers when they choose to settle in cities.
|
|
Received: 29 June 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郑开来. 上海“白领”群像素描[J].社会,2001,(5):19-21.
[2] 张文宏,栾博,蔡思斯.新白领和新生代农民工留城意愿的比较研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2018,(8):140-147.
[3] 李强.我国正在形成“土字型社会结构”[N].北京日报,2015-05-25(18).
[4] 向德平,田北海.对白领焦虑症的社会学思考[J].社会,2003,(5):32-34.
[5] 胡小武. 候鸟型白领:逃离北上广与“大都市化陷阱”[J].中国青年研究,2013,(3):33-36.
[6] 李若建. 广州市外来白领群体现状分析[J].中国人口科学,2009,(2):84-92.
[7] 李强,丁辉文.“新生代白领”进入中产阶层的体制机制障碍——某特大城市高科技园区白领阶层案例研究[J].河北学刊,2018,(5):161-168.
[8] Ritchey,N.Explanations of migration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1976,(1):363-404.
[9] 杨东亮,王晓璐.“90后”流动青年城市居留意愿研究[J].青年研究,2016,(3):39-48.
[10] 于潇,陈新造.“90后”流动青年的广东城市居留意愿及影响因素研究[J].商业研究, 2017,(5):177-183.
[11] 郭郡郡. 流动人口城市居留意愿的影响因素分析——基于居留时限的视角[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(5):40-48.
[12] 李辉,段程允,白宇舒.我国流动人口留城意愿及影响因素研究[J].人口学刊, 2019,(1):80-88.
[13] Portes A.Economic sociology and the sociology of immigration: A conceptual overview[A]. Portes A.(ed.).The economic sociology of immigration: Essays on networks, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship[M]. New York: Russell Sage,1995.1-41.
[14] 廖正宏. 人口迁移[M].台北:三民书局,1986. 150.
[15] 李培林. 流动民工的社会网络和社会地位[J].社会学研究,1996,(4):42-52.
[16] 赵莉. 都市里的搓澡工[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.
[17] 盛亦男. 父代流迁经历对子代居留意愿的代际影响与机制研究[J].人口研究,2017,(2):84-96.
[18] 孟兆敏,吴瑞君.城市流动人口居留意愿研究——基于上海、苏州等地的调查分析[J].人口与发展,2011,(3):11-18.
[19] 林李月,朱宇.流动人口职业流动的收入效应及其性别差异——基于福建的实证[J].人口与经济,2014,(2):3-11.
[20] 李强. 影响中国城乡流动人口的推力与拉力因素分析[J].中国社会科学,2003,(1):125-136.
[21] 陈乙酉,张邦辉.社会保障对农民工流动决策的影响研究——基于“推拉”理论的实证[J].农业经济问题,2018,(10):132-140.
[22] 丁金宏,刘振宇,程丹明,等.中国人口迁移的区域差异与流场特征[J].地理学报,2005,(1):106-114.
[23] 段成荣,杨舸.我国流动人口的流入地分布变动趋势研究[J].人口研究,2009,(6):1-12.
[24] 刘立光,王金营.流动人口城市长期居留意愿的理性选择——基于非线性分层模型的实证研究[J].人口学刊,2019,(3):100-112.
[25] 边燕杰. 找回强关系:中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职[J].国外社会学,1998,(2):50-65.
[26] 杨雪,魏洪英.流动人口长期居留意愿的新特征及影响机制[J].人口研究,2017,(5): 63-73.
[27] 梁土坤.适应转化:新生代流动人口定居意愿的实证研究及其政策意涵[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,(2):151-159.
[28] 乔楠,冯桂平.医疗保险模式对流动人口居留意愿影响研究——基于人群差异性视角[J].中国卫生事业管理,2017,(1):16-21.
[29] 李振刚. 社会融合视角下的新生代农民工居留意愿研究[J].社会发展研究,2014,(3):100-117.
[30] 杨巧,李鹏举.新生代农民工家庭发展能力与城市居留意愿:基于2014年“流动人口动态监测调查”数据的实证研究[J].中国青年研究,2017,(10):50-56. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
