不同货币政策机制下创业导向型政策的宏观经济效应

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (845 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper constructs a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of various forms of employment, examining long-term and short-term macroeconomic effects of policy adjustment aimed at encouraging entrepreneurship in normal times and in an ultra-low interest rate context. The findings are as follows: (1) whether in normal times or in an ultra-low interest rate context, a single entrepreneurship-driven policy (i.e. reducing the cost of self-employment) is faced with the trade-off between long-term benefits and short-term costs; (2) in terms of long-term or short-term effects, the single policy adjustment aimed at encouraging entrepreneurship in normal times widens the income gap between formal sectors and informal sectors, but the single policy adjustment in an ultra-low interest rate context narrows the income gap between sectors; (3) there is no obvious short-term cost in the comprehensive adjustment of multiple policies aimed at encouraging entrepreneurship (including the reduction of the cost of self-employment and the policy adjustment to the formal sector), and the short-term impact of these policies is significantly greater than that of single policy adjustment when the economy is in normal times or in an ultra-low interest rate context; (4) the ultra-low interest rate environment has reduced the short-term macroeconomic impact of the government’s policy of encouraging entrepreneurship, whether it is a single policy adjustment or a comprehensive policy adjustment aimed at encouraging entrepreneurship. Therefore, in order to promote self-employment and reduce the short-term cost of policy adjustment, the government should not only reduce the cost of starting a business, but also adjust policy for formal sectors accordingly.

Key words： entrepreneurship-driven policy self-employment formal sector informal sector macroeconomic impacts

Received: 17 March 2020

PACS:

F015

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Li-feng

Cite this article:

CHEN Li-feng. Macroeconomic Impacts of Entrepreneurship-Driven Policies under Different Monetary Policy Mechanism[J]. , 2020, 37(3): 81-90.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V37/I3/81

[1] 董延芳,张则月.中国创业者创业机会识别研究[J].经济与管理评论,2019,(6):57-67.
[2] Shapiro F.Self-Employment and Business Cycle Persist-ence:Does the Composition of Employment Matter for Economic Recoveries?[J].Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control,2014,46:200-218.
[3] Bernard A.,Redding S.,Schott K.Multi-Product Firms and Product Switch[J].American Economic Review,2010,100(1):70-97.
[4] 高文书,薛进军.非正规就业与城市劳动者收入差距[A].蔡昉,张车伟.中国收入分配问题研究[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016.166-184.
[5] Bilbiie F.,Ghironi F.,Melitz M.Endogenous Entry,Product Variety andBusiness Cycle[J].Journal of Political Econo-my,2012,120(2):304-345.
[6] Epstein B.,Shapiro F.Employment and Firm Heterogeneity,Capital Allocation,and Countercyclical Labor Market Policies[J].Journal of Development Economics,2017,127(C):25-41.
[7] 陈利锋. 劳动力流动模式、宏观经济波动与社会福利—基于包含正规就业与非正规就业的NK-DSGE模型[J].经济与管理评论,2017,(4):18-28.
[8] Feenstra R.,Weistein D.Globalization,Markups,andUS Welfare[J].Journal of Political Economy,2017,125(4):1040-1074.
[9] Perez J.,Aouriri M.,Campos M.The Fiscal and Macroeco-nomic Effects of Government Wage and Employment Reform[R].Banco de Espana Working Papers,2016,No.1607.
[10] Boeri T.,Garibaldi P.A Tale of Comprehensive Labor Market Reforms:Evidence from the Italian Jobs Act[R].CEP Discussing Papers,2019,No.dp1613.
[11] Cacciatore M.,Fioro G.The Macroeconomic Effects of Goods and Labor Markets Deregulation[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2016,20:1-24.
[12] Cacciatore M.,Duval R., Fioro G.,Ghironi F.Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain:Market Deregulation and Monetary Policy in Small Open Economies[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2016,68(C):358-385.
[13] Gomes S.,Jacquinot P.,Mohr M.,Pisani M.Structural Reform and Macroeconomic Performance in the Euro Area Countries:A Model-Based Assessment[J].Internat-ional Finance,2013,16(1):23-44.
[14] 孙国峰,何晓贝.存款利率零下限与负利率传导机制[J].经济研究,2017,(12):105-118.
[15] 陈利锋,钟玉婷.支持增长型货币政策的宏观经济效应——基于超低利率环境的视角[J].江汉学术,2019,(6):46-56.
[16] 杨源源,于津平,高洁超.零利率下限约束、宏观经济波动与混合型货币政策框架[J].财贸经济,2020,(1):21-35.
[17] 马理,娄田田.基于零利率下限约束的宏观政策传导研究[J].经济研究,2015,(11):94-105.
[18] 陆超,孙雅静,杜佳.欧洲负利率政策实施效果评估及展望——基于合成控制法的研究[J].当代财经,2019,(1):60-72.
[19] Gal1′ J.,Monacelli T.Understanding the Gains from Wage Flexibility:The Exchange Rate Connection[J].American Economic Review,2016,106(12):3829-3868.
[20] Christiano L.,Eichenbaum M.,Trabandt M.Unemployment and Business Cycle[J].Econometrics,2016,84(4):1523-1569.
[21] Gal1′ J.The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,2020,Forthcoming.
[22] He D.,Yu X.Network Effects in Currency Internationalis-ation:Insight from BIS Triennial Surveys and Implications for Renminbi[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2016,68(C):203-229.
[23] Bertinelli L.,Cardi O.,Sen P.Deregulation Shocks in Product market and Unemployment[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2013,37(4):711-734.
[24] Igna A.,Rincon-Aznar A.,Venturini F.Upstream Regula-tion,Factor Demand and Productivity:Cross-Industry Differences in OECD Countries,1975-2007[J].Informal Economies and Policy,2019,49(C):1-34.
[25] Rahul A.,Purva K.Macroeconomic Impact of Product and Labor Market Reforms on Informality and Unemployment in India[R].IMF Working Papers,2016,No.16/47.
[26] Debortoli D.,Gal1′ J.,Gambetti L.On the Empirical (Ir)Relevance of the Zero Lower Bound[R].NBER Working Papers,2019,No.w25820.