关学的原型、流变及其研究空间

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (616 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Guan Xue (Guanzhong School) is a regional school derived from Neo-Confucianism in Guanzhong. It was founded by ZHANG Zai in the Northern Song period and declined in the Jin and Yuan Dynasties. However, in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, Neo-Confucian scholars in Guanzhong inherited Guan Xue with great efforts, completing the genealogy of Neo-Confucianism in Guanzhong since ZHANG Zai and making Guan Xue a regional school of Neo-Confucianism which was descended from ZHANG Zai, and integrated Cheng and Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism and Wang Yangming’s Neo-Confucian School of Mind. ZHANG Zai, the founder of Guan Xue, established the framework of Neo-Confucianism with the philosophy system of “Qi-Dao-Xing-Xin-Cheng” together with the scholars of the Northern Song period, in parallel with Luo School (founded by Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi), Lian School (founded by Zhou Dunyi), and Min School (founded by Zhu Xi). In the middle of Ming Dynasty, Lv Nan learned from ZHOU Dun-yi, ZHANG Zai, the Cheng brothers, and Zhu Xi, and drew on each other’s strengths to rectify each other’s weaknesses, reviving Guan Xue with his “Benevolence Philosophy”. In the late Ming Dynasty, Feng Congwu strictly defined Guan Xue through Guan Xue Bian. In the early Qing Dynasty, Li Erqu believed that the practice of the Confucian philosophy was more important than theoretical concepts, and stressed that it was important to “illuminate its embodiment and to adapt its usefulness” (ming ti shi yong 明体适用),which again revived Guan Xue. In the late Qing Dynasty, Liu Guyu, learned in both Chinese and Western philosophies, incorporated modern academics into Guan Xue. In contemporary researches on Guan Xue, scholars have collated relevant literature, and clarified whether “Guan Xue continues after ZHANG Zai”. They have opened up a new field for the researches on Guan Xue by reconstructing the contemporary interpretation system of the logic development of Chinese traditional philosophy, and found a new way of studying Guan Xue, and thus pushed forward the contemporary study of Guan Xue.

Key words： ZHANG Zai Guan Xue (Guanzhong School) academic orthodoxy legitimacy origin historical development research area

Received: 15 February 2020

PACS:

B244.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHANG Xin

Cite this article:

CHANG Xin. Origin, Historical Development and Researches on Guan Xue[J]. , 2020, 37(3): 15-24.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V37/I3/15

[1] 吴学昭. 吴宓与陈寅恪[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1992. 11.
[2] (元)脱脱等.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[3] 章学诚. 章学诚遗书[M].刘承干编校.北京:文物出版社,1985.390.
[4] (宋)李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1980.758.
[5] 钱穆. 中国近三百年学术史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.5.
[6] (清)黄宗羲.宋元学案[M].全祖望补修.陈金生,梁运华点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[7] (宋)张载.张载集[M].章锡琛点校.北京:中华书局,1978.
[8] (宋)程颐,程颢.二程集[M].王孝鱼点校.北京:中华书局,1981.
[9] (宋)杨时.杨时集[M].林海权点校整理.北京:中华书局,2018.541.
[10] (明)冯从吾.关学编[M].陈俊民,徐兴海点校.北京:中华书局,1987.
[11] 陈俊民. 三教融合与中西会通[M].西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2002.236-237.
[12] (清)张廷玉等.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974.7222.
[13] (宋)刘荀.明本释[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983.101.
[14] (清)王夫之.[M].张子正蒙注.北京:中华书局,1975.3.
[15] (清)全祖望.全祖望集汇校集注[M].朱铸禹汇校集注.上海:古籍出版社,2000.2197.
[16] (清)翁方纲.石洲诗话[M].北京:中华书局,1985.82.
[17] (元)脱脱等.金史[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[18] (明)刘昌.中州名贤文表[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.312.
[19] (清)皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,1959.281.
[20] (明)郑晓.今言[M].北京:中华书局,1984.98.
[21] 吕妙芬. 中国哲学与文化[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2010.
[22] (明)吕柟.泾野先生文集[M].米文科点校整理.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.
[23] (明)吕柟.泾野经学文集[M].刘学智点校整理.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.306.
[24] (明)吕柟.泾野先生别集[M].嘉靖二十三年刻本.
[25] (明)韩邦奇.韩邦奇集[M].魏冬点校整理.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.
[26] (明)冯从吾.冯从吾集[M].刘学智,孙学功点校整理.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.
[27] (清)李颙.二曲集[M].陈俊民点校.北京:中华书局,1996.
[28] (清)黄宗羲.明儒学案[M].沈芝盈点校.北京:中华书局,2008.
[29] 民国王钟瀚点校.清史列传[M].北京:中华书局,1987. 5266.
[30] 陈俊民. 张载哲学思想及关学学派[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.
[31] 侯外庐. 中国思想史[M].北京:人民出版社,1957.545.
[32] 侯外庐,邱汉生,张岂之.宋明理学史[M].西安:西北大学出版社,2018.846.
[33] 冯友兰. 中国哲学史(下册)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2000.75.
[34] (宋)朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.63.
[35] 李笠选注. 韩愈文选[M].北京:北新书局,1947.14.
[36] (唐)李翱.李文公集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983. 108.
[37] (明)费密.弘道书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.12.
[38] (清)王先慎集释.韩非子[M].姜俊俊点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2015.553.
[39] 王美凤整理编校.关学史文献辑校[M].西安:西北大学出版社,2015.145-146.
[40] 吴海. 学案体与作为理想境界的宋学——钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》之清学观再探[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2018,(2):111-119.
[41] 钱穆. 中国学术思想史论丛[M].北京:九州出版社,2011.
[42] 梁启超. 梁启超全集[M].北京:北京出版社,1999.4262.
[43] 曹冷泉. 关学概论[J].西北文化月刊,1941,(3):17.
[44] 赵馥杰. 关学精神论[M].西安:西北大学出版社,2015.1.
[45] 张立文. 宋明理学研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1985.174.
[46] 史革新. 清代理学史[M].广州:广东教育出版社,2007. 91-95.
[47] 陈祖武. 清代学术源流[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012.130.
[48] 陈来. “关学”的精神[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,45(3):7-9.
[49] 杨国荣. 关学的哲学意蕴[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(1):21-25.
[50] 许鹤龄. 李二曲“体用全学”[M].台北:文史哲出版社(台湾),2004.39.
[51] 王昌伟. 中国历史上的关中士人:907-1911[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2017.
[52] Handlin,Joanna F.Action in Late Ming Thought:The Reorientation of Lü K’un and Other Scholar-Officials[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press,1983.89-93.
[53] Rowe.Saving the Word:Chen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth Century China[M].Stanford University Press,2001.136.
[54] (明)唐龙.渔石集·正学书院志序[M].明嘉靖刻本.
[55] (清)贺瑞麟.贺瑞麟集[M].王长坤,刘峰点校整理.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.62.
[56] 赵尔巽. 清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1976.13099.