故事说理、儒术选士与汉代子书的兴衰

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (629 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The burning of books by Qin Shi Huang (the First Emperor of a unified China and founder of the Qin dynasty) posed a big threat to academic development, but it didn’t cause a break in scholarship as it didn’t last a long time. The scholarship of Han Dynasty is the inheritance and continuation of that of the Warring States period. At the end of the Warring States period, philosophy books mostly illustrated points with stories, which was completely inherited by philosophy books in the Han Dynasty. The reign of Emperor Hanwu is a watershed in the development of philosophy books. Philosophy books flourished before the reign of Emperor Hanwu but declined after his reign, which was caused by the combination of internal and external factors. As for external factors, on the one hand, the establishment of Confucianism as standard for selecting officials rendered other scholastic thoughts “useless”, and thus greatly compressed their development space. On the other hand, the adherence to “Shi Fa (tracing the source)” and “Jia Fa (evolving into a school)” made Confucian teachings have too much conformity but little creativity. As for the philosophy books of the Han Dynasty, their characteristics of reasoning with stories was very much the same as the tactic Sima Qian used in Records of History. Sima Qian’s success ushered in a new era of historiography, and it has endured ever since. Under the influence of both internal and external factors, in the late Western Han Dynasty, the creation of philosophy books took a non-mainstream path and there is no turning back ever since.

Key words： philosophy books of Han Dynasty reasoning through storytelling rise of history books and fall of philosophy books Confucianism as established standard for official selection philosophy books of the Warring States period new philosophy books of Confucianism

Received: 25 October 2019

PACS:

I206

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Jian-hua

Cite this article:

LI Jian-hua. Reasoning through Storytelling,Confucianism as Established Standard for Official Selection and Rise and Fall of Philosophy Books in the Han Dynasty[J]. , 2020, 37(1): 145-151.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V37/I1/145

[1] 尹玉珊. 汉魏子书叙录[A].汉魏子书研究[D].中国社会科学院研究生院博士学位论文,2010.150-163.
[2] 胡适. 中国哲学史大纲[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997. 280.
[3] 张启云. 论西汉时的“子学没落,儒学独尊”问题[J].史学月刊,2003,(1):15-21.
[4] 钱穆. 国史大纲[M].北京:商务印书馆,1991.
[5] 黄晖. 论衡校释[M].北京:中华书局,1990.
[6] 詹锳. 文心雕龙义证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989. 633.
[7] 张启云. 中国古代思想文化的历史论析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.96-99.
[8] 于智荣. 贾谊新书译注·前言[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2003.2.
[9] (汉)高诱.淮南鸿烈解叙[A].张双棣.淮南子校释[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[10] 王利器. 新语校注[M].北京:中华书局,1986.75-79.
[11] 阎振益,钟夏.新书校注[M].北京:中华书局,2000.246.
[12] 张双棣. 淮南子校释[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013. 1142.
[13] 王利器. 盐铁论校注[M].北京:中华书局,1992.438.
[14] (清)赵翼.廿二史劄记[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2008.6.
[15] (唐)刘知幾撰,(清)浦起龙通释.史通[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.241.
[16] 李建华. 东汉洛阳兰台、东观文人群体及其创作考论[J].古籍整理研究学刊,2015,(1):1-8.
[17] (晋)袁山松.后汉书[A].(南朝·宋)范晔撰,(唐)李贤等注.后汉书(卷四十九注)[M].北京:中华书局,1965. 1629.
[18] (晋)葛洪.抱朴子[A].(南朝·宋)范晔撰,(唐)李贤等注.后汉书(卷四十九注)[M].北京:中华书局,1965. 1629.
[19] 梁启超. 中国近三百年学术史[M].天津:天津古籍出版社,2003.267.
[20] 李振宏. 汉代儒学的经学化进程[J].中国史研究,2013,(1):31-68.
[21] 王国维. 汉魏博士考[A].观堂集林[C].北京:中华书局,1959.176.
[22] 张汉东. 论秦汉博士制度[A].安作璋,熊铁基.秦汉官制史稿·附录[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2007.411.
[23] 夏增民.博士制度与秦朝政治转折[J].南都学坛(哲学社会科学版),1999,(2):13-15、24.
[24] 钱穆. 两汉博士家法考[A].两汉经学今古文平议[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
[25] (清)皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[26] (清)李兆洛.顾君墓志铭[A].(清)顾千里.顾千里集·附录[M].北京:中华书局,2007.406.
[27] 徐复观. 中国经学史的基础[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2002.75.
[28] 蒋国保. 汉儒之“师法”、“家法”考[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(3):141-148.
[29] (清)王鸣盛.十七史商榷[M].南京:凤凰出版社,2008. 148.