惩罚性违约金的接纳与规制:以当事人中心主义为视角

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (485 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era. Respecting the autonomy of will in private society is a fundamental manifestation of the people-oriented principle, while contract freedom is an important embodiment of private autonomy. In the process of the conclusion of a contract, the two parties regulate the interest relationship between them through the penalty clause, which is essential to contract freedom. Penalty can be classified into punitive penalty and compensation penalty. At present, there is no clear provision in our legislative and judicial practice for punitive penalty. To build a smart society, we need to recognize and accept punitive penalty. This is an important measure to reflect the people-oriented principle and conduct reform at national system level. It is true that punitive penalty provides provisions for the two parties to handle future probable affairs, and it concerns significant interests of both parties. Therefore, it is the duty for legislative and judicial bodies to properly adjust their stipulations in accordance with the principle of fairness, justice, and the balance of interests.

Key words： intelligence penalty punishment autonomy of will judicial review

Received: 16 November 2018

PACS:

D923.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Li-min
	GONG Shuang-xia

Cite this article:

WANG Li-min,GONG Shuang-xia. Acceptance and Regulation of Punitive Penalty from the Perspective of Adversary System[J]. , 2019, 36(2): 74-82.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I2/74

[1] 王泽鉴.债法原理(第二版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[2] 胡启忠. 契约正义论[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[3] 卢梭. 社会契约论[M].李平沤译,北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[4] 马克思恩格斯全集(第16卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1964.16.
[5] 黄风. 罗马法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.195. 196.195.206.
[6] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M]克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.180.
[7] 梁慧星. 民法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.46-47.
[8] 大卫·戴岑豪斯.合法性与正当性——魏玛时代的施米特、凯尔森与海勒[M].刘毅译.北京:商务印书馆,2013. 173.
[9] 韩世远.违约金的理论问题——以合同法第114条为中心的解释论[J].法学研究,2003,(4).
[10] 马克思恩格斯全集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1956.82.
[11] 张文显. 法的概念[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.166.
[12] 王利明.法治:良法与善治[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[13] 格雷厄姆·沃拉斯.政治中的人性[M].朱曾汶译.北京:商务印书馆,2015.65.
[14] 霍布斯.法律要义. 自然法与民约法[M].张书友译.北京:中国法制出版社,2010.76.
[15] E.博登海默.法理学—法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017.
[16] 约翰·罗尔斯.正义论(修订版) [M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[17] 范忠信,郑定,詹学农.情理法与中国人(修订版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[18] 霍布豪斯. 自由主义[M].朱曾汶译.北京:商务印书馆,2017.
[19] 葛德文. 论财产[M].何清新译.北京:商务印书馆,2017.
[20] 人民网.十九大报告[EB/OL].http://sh.people.com.cn/n2/2018/0313/c134768-31338145.html, 2018-05-08.
[21] 刘敬东. 理性、自由与实践批判[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2015.83.
[22] 张文显. 权利与人权[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.303.
[23] 严存生. 法的价值问题研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.