“中印学”构建：根基、拓展、走向

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (582 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Sino-Indian Studies (Chindia) initiated by Rabindrananth Tagore and Visiva Bharat is an open-ended topic. Its academic discourse, content and extension have been constantly constructed and enriched. Since 1930s, four great Indologists Prabodh Chandra Bagchi, S. Radhakrishnan, Tan Chung, Lokesh Chandra have composed several volumes of India and China with the approaches of historiography, comparative culture and comparative philosophy, reflecting the development of Sino-Indian studies in the past century. Following the tradition of French Sinology, Prabodh Chandra Bagchi recreated the exchanges between China and India with concrete historical evidence. Lokesh Chandra and his father Raghu Vira, a renowned Sinologist, combined historical researches and travel notes such as personal visits, fieldworks, oral accounts and diaries to prove history with “cultural relics” and recapture the cultural exchange at that time. Raghu Vira’s visit to China in 1955 is a precious memory of the cultural exchanges between China and India in modern times. Tan Chung conducted a comparative study on the original culture and the dynamic influence of culture to explore the cultural genes that may be shared by Chinese and Indian civilizations. From the perspective of religious studies, S. Radhakrishnan made a comparative analysis of the secularity of Confucianism, the transcendence of Taoism and the spirituality of Buddhism, realizing that Chinese thoughts and Indian thoughts both aim at the spiritual transformation of human beings. Chinese thoughts and Indian thoughts may share similarities and fuse with each other. Moreover, the significance of the fusion lies in the reconstruction of values, which is also the fundamental purpose of “Sino-Indian studies” which started from cultural exchanges and aims at the establishment of new civilizations.

Key words： Sino-Indian studies(Chindia) India and China Prabodh Chandra Bagchi S. Radhakrishnan Tan Chung Lokesh Chandra Raghu Vira

Received: 10 September 2018

PACS:

G112

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHU Xuan

Cite this article:

ZHU Xuan. Construction of Sino-Indian Studies: Foundation, Expansion and Trend[J]. , 2018, 35(6): 13-21.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2018/V35/I6/13

[1] (印度)拉奥琦. 论罗宾德拉纳特泰戈尔的印中视角:二十一世纪展望[J].今日印度(“纪念泰戈尔诞辰150周年”特刊),2011,(5):3.
[2] (印度)泰戈尔. 东方文明的危机——在上海各团体欢迎会上的演讲[A].孙宜学.泰戈尔与中国[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005.172.
[3] 郁龙余,刘朝华.中外文学交流史交流史(中国-印度卷)[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2015.
[4] 黄绮淑. 泰戈尔与谭云山的中印友好情结[A].谭中,郁龙余.谭云山[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2012.201.
[5] 墨普德. “汉学”还是“汉印学”:探寻一个包罗万象的科学阐释[A].郁龙余.深圳大学印度研究通讯,2014,(3):44.
[6] Rabindranath Tagore and Tan Yunshan. China and India[J].Nanking and Santiniketan:The Sino-Indian Cultural Society.April 1938.
[7] 何兆武,柳卸林.中国印象:外国名人论中国文化[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.595.
[8] (印度)师觉月. 印度与中国[A].印度驻北京大使馆. 2012,11.
[9] 谭中,耿引曾.印度与中国——两大文明的交往和激荡[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[10] Lokesh Chandra.India and China[M].New Delhi:International Academy of Indian Culture and Aditya Prakas-han.2016.
[11] (印度)师觉月. 印度与中国:千年文化关系[M].姜景奎等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[12] 陈明.中印文化2000年交互流动的真实面相[N].中华读书报,2016-10-26(22).
[13] 季羡林. 季羡林全集(第十五卷)[M].北京:北京外语教学与研究出版社,2010.313.
[14] (印度)杰伦·兰密施.理解CHINDIA——关于中国与印度的思考[M].蔡枫,董方峰译.银川:宁夏人民出版社,2006.3.
[15] S.Radhakrishnan.India and China: Lectures Delivered in China in May 1944[M].Bombay:Hind Kitabs,1944.
[16] 徐梵澄. 《玄理参同》序[A].徐梵澄.古典重温:徐梵澄随笔[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.31.
[17] 牟宗三. 中国哲学十九讲[M].长春:吉林出版集团,2013.8.
[18] 徐梵澄. 徐梵澄文集(一)[M].上海:上海三联书店,2005.415.
[19] 孙波. 徐梵澄精神哲学入蹊[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.90.