|
|
|
| Characteristics and Generation Mechanism of Equity Disputes in Rural Stock Cooperative Economy |
| DU Yuan-yuan1,2 |
1.Institute of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640;
2. South China Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract It is generally believed that the collective appeal to a clear boundary, the imperfect property rights system, and the conflict between the law and the village rules are the main reasons for the rural equity disputes. A classification study of equity disputes in rural stock cooperative economy in Dongguan shows that rural equity shares are mixed with the “membership” of traditional communities, and its rights and interests have multiple characteristics, which in turn results in a distinct community-based rural equity disputes which are different from those in modern companies. Therefore, multiple equity is the trait of rural equity disputes, and community-based features are distinctive of rural equity disputes. As a result, the generation mechanism of rural equity disputes has its own characteristics, manifested in the rights of shareholders being connected with the obligations of residents, the appeal of shareholders to the rights of community members being important content of equity disputes, and the differential distribution of community welfare being hidden risk of equity disputes. To analyze and solve the causes of rural equity disputes, we should admitted the multiplicity and community-based features of rural equity in order to smoothly promote the reform of rural property rights system.
|
|
Received: 15 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 于幼军. 农村股份合作经济崛起的原因和条件[J].学术研究,1992,(4):29-33.
[2] 杨一介. 农村地权制度中的农民集体成员权[J].云南大学学报(法学版),2008,(5):119-123.
[3] 折晓叶. 村庄边界的多元化——经济边界开放与社会边界封闭的冲突与共生[J].中国社会科学,1996,(3):66-78.
[4] 柏兰芝. 集体的重构:珠江三角洲地区农村产权制度的演变——以“外嫁女”为例[J].开放时代,2013,(3):109-129.
[5] 杨福忠. 法律在农村被边缘化问题研究——以外嫁女权益纠纷为切入点的初步考察[J].法学杂志,2010,(11):82-85.
[6] 陈端洪. 排他性与他者化:中国农村“外嫁女”案件的财产权分析[J].北大法律评论,2003, (2):321-333.
[7] 张庆东,陈向波.农村“外嫁女”权益纠纷若干法律问题研究[J].福建法学,2006,(2): 55-58.
[8] 贺欣. 为什么法院不接受外嫁女纠纷——司法过程中的法律、权力和政治[J].法律和社会科学,2008,(3):66-97.
[9] 桂华. 论法治剩余的行政吸纳——关于”外嫁女“上访的体制解释[J].开放时代,2017,(2):164-183.
[10] 申静,王汉生.集体产权在中国乡村社会生活中的实践逻辑——社会学视角下的产权建构过程[J].社会学研究,2005,(1):113-148.
[11] 周雪光. “关系产权”:产权制度的一个社会学解释[J].社会学研究,2005,(2):1-29.
[12] 姜美善,商春荣.农民股份合作制发展中的妇女土地权益[J].农村经济,2009,(6):23-26.
[13] 罗必良,潘光辉等.社区型股份合作制:改革面临创新——基于“龙岗模式”的理论与实证研究[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(4):1-10.
[14] 蒋志宏. 农村“外嫁女”权益纠纷问题法律探索[J].南方农村,2004,(4):35-38.
[15] 费孝通.江村经济:中国农民的生活[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.156.
[16] David Faure.The Structure of Chinese Rural Society Lineage and village in the Eastern[M].Hong Kong:Oxford University Press,1986.168.
[17] 陈锡文. 集体经济、合作经济与股份合作经济[J].中国农村经济,1992,(11):14-16.
[18] 贺雪峰. 农村集体产权制度改革与乌坎事件的教训[J].行政论坛,2017,(3):12-17.
[19] 王欣新. 公司法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008. 115-151. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 35 
