|
|
From Realism to Classicism: The Value of Chinese Centennial Literature and Art Trends |
PAN Shui-ping |
Institute of Taoism and Religious Culture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064 |
|
|
Abstract In the 20th century, the literary world of modern China was actually veiled and interwoven with a kind of literary and artistic symptoms that were rather sophistry, generality, and attachment, that is, "realism" to interpret the dislocation, paradox, concealment, obscurity, and intolerance of Chinese classical cultural traditions. It should be said that this is inseparable from the origin of classicism that was dusty or even misread in China in the 20th century. Regarding the interpretation of Chinese classical cultural traditions by "realism" rather than "classicism", the inherent thinking logic and the problem of the source of discourse hegemony are distorted, flawed, and marginal. In the current academic circles, it has not attracted the corresponding high attention, clear description, profound criticism and rational correction, and it is still in the situation of being blind. This is undoubtedly extremely regrettable.It is worth mentioning that through the historical context of the Chinese literary and art phenomena that have been superimposed in the century of the 20th century, it can be clearly seen that the mainstream consciousness has undergone rapid changes, the integration of multicultural horizons, and the shift of theoretical construction values. It is precisely the main cause of the inner vein that caused this phenomenon of sexual literature and art. It is necessary to explore this topic in an extended way. It can also provide people with a deep understanding and overall grasp of the fate of "classicism" in China, and provide a kind of internal discussion that points to high distance and a new and sharp modern differentiation.
|
Received: 10 February 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李钧. 中和与重构,归心与返魅——20世纪中国新古典主义文学论纲[J].文艺争鸣,2010,(7):75-79. [2] 朱立元. 西方美学范畴史(卷3)[M].太原:山西教育出版社,2008.266. [3] 梁实秋. 浪漫的与古典的·文学的纪律[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1988.22. [4] 周来祥. 是古典主义还是现实主义——从意境谈起[J].文学遗产,1980,(3):111-116. [5] 周来祥. 古典和谐美的理想与中国古代艺术的模式[J].江汉论坛,1983,(10):44-49. [6] 刘绍瑾. 复古与复元古:中国复古文学理论的美学探源[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001. [7] (意大利)克罗齐. 历史学的理论与实际[M].傅任敢译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.2. [8] 杨春时.走出古典主义和新古典主义[J].海南师范学院学报,1995,(2):1-4+46. [9] 朱光潜. 朱光潜全集(第三卷)[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,1987. [10] 余光中.余光中集(第七卷)[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,2004.162. [11] 俞兆平. 现代性与五四文学思潮[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2006.123. [12] 范曾. 范曾谈美[M].天津:南开大学出版社,2009.63. [13] 白石. 关于古典文学的人民性的几个问题[J].学术月刊,1957,(3):63-70. [14] 刘再复,林岗.从传统到现代的转化[J].福建论坛,1988,(5):6-12. [15] 张林杰. 守旧与开新——20世纪中国新古典主义文学思潮摭谈[J].社会科学辑刊,1999,(6):147-150. [16] 白春超. 再生与流变:中国现代文学中的古典主义[M].开封:河南大学出版社,2006.43. [17] 朱自清. 文学的标准与尺度[M].凌云岚考释.济南:山东文艺出版社,2006.14. [18] 余光中.余光中集(第四卷)[M].天津:百花文艺出版社,2004.226. [19] 马茂军.论中国古典主义散文的强势传统[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(5):26-31+38+158. |
|
|
|