|
|
|
| Historical Logic of Water Control, Opening up Waterways and Grain Transport by Water in Ancient China |
| WU Shi-yong |
| College of History, Culture and Tourism, Huaiyin Normal College, Huaian, Jiangsu, 223001 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Politics is an important key to understanding the historical logic of water control, opening up waterways, and grain transport by water in ancient China. From the point of view of historical development, there was a centralized system of unification in the first place, and then the water conservancy society developing from water control and not the opposite. With the political center and the basic economic zone gradually separated, and the continuous development of centralized political dynasty, canals were dug and grain was constantly transported to the capital, and grain transport by water and the corresponding system thus came into being. From the historical logic, however, there is only indirect causality between grain transport by water and opening up waterways. Canals are neither a sufficient condition nor a necessary condition for the institutionalization of grain transport by water. Institutionalization of grain transport by water can be attributed to politicalization of canals, which is reflected not only by the improvement of canals and establishment of official positions in grain transport by water system, but also the fact that the central government used all political resources, and even sacrificed local interest to give full support to grain transport by water, and in this process emerged a political interest group.
|
|
Received: 18 January 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 姚汉源. 中国水利史纲要·自序[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1987.2.
[2] 行龙. 从治水社会到水利社会[J].读书,2005,(8):59.
[3] 马克思恩格斯选集[M]马克思恩格斯选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[4] 杨竞业. 论形成亚细亚生产方式理论的三个矛盾关系[J].哈尔滨市委党校学报,2007,(5):16.
[5] [德]魏特夫.东方专制主义·前言[M].徐式谷等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989.2.
[6] 秦晖.“治水社会论”批判[N].经济观察报,2010-07-21(4).
[7] 吴宗越. 华夏文明始于治水[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2001,(3):59-62.
[8] 傅衣凌. 中国传统社会——多元的结构[J].中国社会经济史研究,1988,(3):4.
[9] 许慎. 说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,1963.237.
[10] 司马迁. 史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.1422.
[11] 丘濬. 大学衍义补[M].北京:京华出版社,1999.
[12] 段玉裁. 说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988. 566.
[13] 张舜徽. 说文解字约注[M].郑州:中州书画社,1983. 121.
[14] 何乔远. 名山藏[M].张德信等点校.福州:福建人民出版社,2010.1350.
[15] 吕祖谦. 历代制度详说[M].两淮马裕家藏本.扬州:江苏广陵古籍刻印社,1983.68.
[16] 鲍邦彦. 明代漕运研究[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,1995.1.
[17] 彭云鹤. 明清漕运史·前言[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,1995.1.
[18] 李治亭. 中国漕运史·序言[M].台北:文津出版社,1997.1.
[19] [日]星斌夫.明代漕運の研究·绪言[M].東京:日本學術振興會,1963.1.
[20] 吴琦. 中国漕运产生的历史动因[J].华中师范大学学报,1995,(3):206.
[21] 陈锋. 漕运与古代社会[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000.19.
[22] 倪玉平. 清代漕粮海运与社会变迁·绪言[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2005.10.
[23] 卢少华,徐万珉.权力社会学[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1989.114.
[24] 马俊亚. 被牺牲的“局部”——淮北社会生态变迁研究(1680—1949)·导言[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.10.
[25] 冀朝鼎. 中国历史上的基本经济区与水利事业的发展[M].朱诗鳌译.北京:社会科学出版社,1981.61.
[26] 马正林. 中国运河的变迁[J].陕西师范大学学报,1978,(1):69.
[27] 谭其骧. 黄河与运河的变迁[J].地理知识,1955,(9):24.
[28] 樊铧. 政治决策与明代海运[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.79-82.
[29] 杜佑. 通典[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1987.162.
[30] 王在晋. 通漕类编[A].四库全书存目丛书·史部(第275册)[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1995.242.
[31] 顾炎武. 天下郡国利病书[A].续修四库全书·史部地理类(第596册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.64.
[32] 利玛窦,金尼阁. 利玛窦中国札记[M].何高济等译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001.229.
[33] 李文治,江太新.清代漕运[M].北京:社科文献出版社,2008.361.
[34] 王庆云. 石渠余纪[M].北京:北京古籍出版社,1985.50.
[35] 武同举. 江苏淮北水道变迁史[M]. 南京:南京大学图书馆藏印本,1927.5.
[36] 朱国盛. 南河志[A].续修四库全书·史部地理类(第728册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.14.
[37] 魏源. 魏源集[M].北京:中华书局,1976.408.
[38] 马俊亚. 集团利益与国运衰变——明清漕粮河运及其社会生态后果[J].南京大学学报,2008,(4):118.
[39] 汪胡桢,吴慰祖.清代河臣传[M].南京:中国水利工程学会,1937.147.
[40] 刘锦藻. 清朝续文献通考[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1988.672.
[41] 张廷玉等撰,纪昀等校订.清朝文献通考[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1988.541. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 35 
