美国地缘政治战略演变中的遏制思维：从“选择性遏制”到“印太战略”

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (573 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The theory of geopolitical strategy in the United States is the theoretical foundation for the U.S. to formulate its foreign policy and global strategy. Containing potential adversaries in a geo-economic context is a need to safeguard the strategic interests of the United States. The thinking of "selective containment" runs through the entire course of the Cold War and is also used by the Washington-dominated China League. However, with the simultaneous rise of China and India in Asia and the historic shift of the global economic and geopolitical center from the Atlantic Ocean to the Indo-Pacific region, the Indo-Pacific region as a whole has been increasingly receiving the support of the governments of the United States, Australia, Japan and other countries s concern. In November 2017, at the APEC meeting, Trump put forward a new concept of Asia policy - the "Indo-Pacific Strategy." This strategy is not only the need of the Trump administration to adjust its foreign policy but also the possible pressure exerted by the United States in its response to China’s "Belt and Road" initiative or is it a carrier of the “induced” tactics used by the United States. It can be said that in the future, the strategic game of blocked and the breakthrough between China and the United States in the “Indo-Pacific” frontier will be more intense. “strategic triangle” pattern of China, the United States and India has formed,The security cooperation between China and India in the Indian Ocean is a win-win strategy for the two countries. How is difficult at present , Although there are difficulties at present to push the two countries for a big stride toward cooperation , there are still many ways to Reach a cooperation

Key words： The United States geopolitical strategy "selective containment policy" "Indo-Pacific" strategy "The principled security network" Sino-India relations

Received: 09 December 2017

F114

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HUANG He

Cite this article:

HUANG He. The containment thinking in the evolution of American geopolitical strategy: from “selective containment” to “Indo-Pacific”strategy[J]. , 2018, 35(1): 72-78.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2018/V35/I1/72

[1] 安倍晋三钓鱼岛局势最新态度预建“民主安全菱形”强调印度忽略韩国[DB/OL]. http://www.kankanews.com/a/2013-01-13/0012193125.shtml.
[2] 詹姆斯·多尔蒂,小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫.争论中的国际关系理论[M].阎学通,陈寒溪等译.北京：世界知识出版社,2003.166-167.
[3] 孙向东.地缘政治学：思想史上的不同视角[M].北京：中共中央党校出版社,2004.39.
[4] 胡志丁,陆大道.基于批判地缘政治学视角解读经典地缘政治理论[J].地理学报,2015,(6):854.
[5] 章毅君.美国的地缘政治战略及二战后的美土关系[J].历史教学,2003,(3):24.
[6] 侯典芹.传统地缘政治学对美国“遏制”战略的影响及其现实意义[J].苏州大学学报,2017,(4).
[7] 姬高升.美国的地缘战略[J].国际观察,2000,(4):9.
[8] 乔治.F.凯南.凯南日记[M].曹明玉译.北京：中信出版集团,2016.2.
[9] 约翰·加迪斯.遏制战略：战后美国国家安全政策评析[M].时殷弘等译.北京：世界知识出版社,2005.30.
[10] 威廉·内斯特.国际关系：21世纪的政治与经济[M].姚远,汪恒译.北京：北京大学出版社,2005.121.
[11] 张曙光.美国遏制战略与冷战起源再探[M].北京：上海外语教育出版社,2007.4-7 .
[12] Foreign Relations of the United States (1948). 1973. Vol.9.The Far East: China[M].Washington: United States Government Printing Office. 16 vols. pp.826-834.
[13] 陶文钊.美国对华政策文件集(1949-1972）第一卷（上）[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003.104-105.
[14] 姜彦名,王传辉.浅析冷战初期美国对华经济政策[J].法制与社会,2008,(33):371.
[15] 周建明.遏制战略中的“相对安全”目标[J].国际观察,2007,(6):71.
[16] 约翰·米尔斯海默.大国政治的悲剧[M].王义栀,唐小松译.上海：上海人民出版社,2014.406-407.
[17] 陆俊元.美国对华地缘战略与中国和平发展[J].人文地理,2006,(1):121.
[18] 门洪华.中国对美国的主流战略认知[J].国际观察,2014,(1):16.
[19] 吴佩环.2016中国周边国家军事形势综述[J].坦克装甲车辆·新军事,2017,(2):34.
[20] ASEAN’s Geopolitical Arrangement Vis-à-vis The Chinese Containment Coalition[DB/OL].https://orientalreview.org/2015/03/28/aseans-geopolitical-arrangement-vis-a-vis-the-chinese-containment-coalition/.
[21] 韦宗友.美国在印太地区的战略调整及其地缘战略影响[J].世界经济与政治,2013,(10):141.
[22] “亚太”的缘起与多国战略博弈[DB/OL].http://www.cctb.net/llyj/lldt/qqzl/201408t20140804_3113 18.htm.
[23] 安倍抵印被莫迪“熊抱”,将签众多协议完成日印首次军备采购[DB/OL].http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail _forward_1793800.
[24] The 'New Cold War' Was Never Inevitable[DB/OL].http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-new-cold-war-was-never-inevitable-22023.
[25] 荣鹰.从“马拉巴尔”军演看大国印太战略互动新态势[J].和平与发展,2017,(5):52.
[26] 约瑟夫·奈.美国无需遏制中国发展唯一能遏制中国的国家就是其本身[DB/OL].http://www.guancha.cn/Yue SeFu-Nai/2016_11_12_3803 21.shtml.
[27] 日本拟将印太战略写入海洋政策日媒：意在抗衡中国[DB/OL].http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2017-12-06/doc -ifyphtze 4838766.shtml.
[28] 李敦球.“新冷战”或己爆发[J].理论与当代,2016,(55)55.
[29] 梅冠群.从特朗普亚洲行看中美关系的六个“之争”[J].中国发展观察,2017,(22):30.
[30] 王晓文.中印在印度洋上的战略冲突与合作潜质[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2017,(1):61.
[31] 林民旺.中印关系的新趋势与新挑战[J].国际问题研究,2017,(4):125.
[32] 中印喜马拉雅对峙是中国要印度接受变化的现实[DB/OL].http://www.ccnovel.com/bolan/2017-07-19/109 861_2.html.
[33] 常璐璐,陈志敏.吸引性经济权力在中国外交中的运用[J].外交评论,2014,(3):1.