|
|
Inheritance and Transcendence: Innovation in Theoretical Paradigm of Spatial Economics |
SUN Hao-jin |
Institute of Economics, Heilongjiang Academy of Social Sciences, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150018 |
|
|
Abstract Through the history of spatial economics, earlier economic thinkers and subsequent spatial economists all made important interpretations of spatial economic thinking, but have not formed an independent systematic theoretical paradigm, let alone unique theoretical features. In theoretical paradigm of spatial economics, there are such problems as vague definition of some theories, lack of connotation in basic theories, and disconnected theoretical system, which has seriously affected the development of the theory itself and the study of realistic problems. The paradigm requires immediate remedy for its intrinsic flaws to improve, innovate and develop itself. Innovation of the paradigm is not to deny the past. The tools and laws in traditional spatial economics are important categories in future paradigm innovation. Innovation of spatial economics paradigm is to establish new paradigm logic, new paradigm content, and new paradigm framework on the basis of inheriting traditional tools, principles, and laws. To be specific, the innovation includes defining basic logic, introducing endogenous analysis, and establishing a unified framework. It is accumulative new development within the paradigm, which ultimately leads to progressive paradigm innovation.
|
Received: 09 August 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980. [2] 约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济分析史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1991. [3] 吴宇晖,张嘉昕.外国经济思想史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014. [4] 冯·杜能.孤立国同农业和国民经济的关系[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986. [5] 阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.工业区位论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997. [6] 奥古斯特·勒施.经济空间秩序[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995. [7] 赫希曼.经济发展战略[M].北京:商务印书馆,1991. [8] 列斐伏尔.空间:社会产物与使用价值[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006. [9] 皮埃尔·菲利普·库姆斯,蒂里·迈耶,雅克·弗朗索瓦·蒂斯.经济地理学:区域和国家一体化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011. [10] 克鲁格曼,藤田昌久,维纳布尔斯.空间经济学:城市、区域与国际贸易[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005. [11] 约瑟夫·熊彼特.经济分析史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1991. [12] 托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1980. |
|
|
|