|
|
|
| Aesthetical Theories of ZHANG Bo-ju: A Good Theory of Ci in the 20th Century after WANG Guo-wei |
| JIN Chun-yuan1, 2 |
1.Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241;
2.Associate Research Fellow of Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The publication of WANG Guo-wei’s Ren Jian Ci Hua has epoch-making significance for critical theories of Ci in the 20th century. His “Jingjie (realm) Theory” is, to some extent, taken as the criteria to judge the quality of Ci. His criticism often goes beyond the text. However, whether WANG’s critical approach and criteria represent the whole picture of last century’s critical theories of Ci, or there are some works on Ci comparable to Ren Jian Ci Hua needs further discussion. In comparison with WANG Guo-wei, ZHANG Bo-ju’s Cong Bi Ci Hua inherits “Bense (true quality) Theory”, attaching importance to writers’ disposition and innate nature. Emphasizing both Shengqing (tone and emotion) and Ciqing (sentiment of Ci), he focuses on the text itself. His critical approach not only reflects a professional Ci writer’s understanding of the origin and development of Ci, but also provides a remedy for the flaws in WANG Guo-wei’s theory in the study of Ci and the theory of Ci. This work on Ci presents another good theory of Ci in the 20th century after WANG Guo-wei.
|
|
Received: 11 March 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 施议对.王国维与中国当代词学──《人间词话》导读[A].施议对.人间词话译注（增订本）[C].长沙：岳麓书社,2003.
[2] 施议对.王国维治词业绩平议沈阳[J].辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,1989,(5):93.
[3] 施议对.当代词综(前言)[M].福州：海峡文艺出版社,2002.30.
[4] 寿康.丛碧词话(序) [M].油印版,1961.1.
[5] 张伯驹.张伯驹集[M].上海：上海古籍出版社,2013.
[6] 晏几道.小山词自序[A].施蛰存.词籍序跋萃编[C].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1994.52.
[7] 陈廷焯.白雨斋词话[A].唐圭璋.词话丛编（第四册）[C].北京：中华书局,2012.3790.
[8] 范松义.南宋中期词学理论的拓展与新变[J].学术论坛,2015,(6):87.
[9] 王又华.古今词论（一卷）[A].唐圭璋编.词话丛编（第一册）[C].北京：中华书局,2012.609. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 34 
