|
|
From Foolishness to Clarity: the Objective of “Knowing” in Daoism |
Choi Ki-hoon |
School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872 |
|
|
Abstract Laozi proposes devotion to dao through daily reduction, a method of attaining knowledge of dao through reduction and non-action. This form of knowing differs from ordinary knowledge or learning. Laozi rejects the knowledge in the form of aphorisms of mundane people, seeing through its imperfections and inability to lead to a grasp of dao as a whole, and thus proposes an ending of knowledge such that through this ending of knowledge one can reach the knowledge of non-knowing. Foolishness is the realm of non-knowing, and thus also the precondition for grasping or understanding dao. Non-knowing does not mean simply knowing nothing, but rather signifies a process of seeing through the distinctions and preconceptions of the mind, transcending their limits, and developing a higher level of knowing. This process can be summarized as one of ending of knowledge and entering into non-knowing, and through non-knowing attaining an understanding of dao. Understanding of dao can be divided into understanding through knowledge of constancy, and understanding through seeing the small. Understanding through knowledge of constancy signifies grasping the “greatness” of dao as returning together with things, while understanding through seeing the small signifies grasping the “smallness” of dao as softness, weakness, and subtlety. Thus from knowing to foolishness, from foolishness to clarity, transcending common knowledge and attaining the knowing of dao, seeing the subtlety of dao and returning to the clarity of the root, this is the real objective of Daoist “knowing”.
|
Received: 05 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张岱年.中国哲学大纲——中国哲学问题史(下册)[M].北京:昆仑出版社,2010.555. [2] 唐君毅.哲学概论(上册)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.159. [3] 杨丙安.老子古本合校[M].北京:中华书局,2014.19. [4] 朱谦之.老子校释[M].北京:中华书局,1984.18. [5] 憨山.老子道德经解[M].武汉:崇文书局,2015.71. [6] 吴澄.道德真经吴澄注[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.62. |
|
|
|