|
|
|
| Current Situation, Problems of International Poverty-alleviation Cooperation in Lancang-Mekong Subregion and Suggestions |
| LUO Sheng-rong |
| Research Center of China's Diplomatic Policy with its Neighboring Countries and Institute of International Relations, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650091 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Lancang-Mekong sub-region is a key area for poverty alleviation in international community as poverty has been a prominent problem there. A series of multilateral and bilateral international cooperation mechanisms for poverty alleviation have been developed, which have promoted infrastructure construction, the development in agriculture, tourism, trade, and human resources in this sub-region. All these efforts, to a certain extent, have alleviated poverty in this region. Nevertheless, many international mechanisms for poverty alleviation, to some extent, have also resulted in mechanism congestion. Lancang-Mekong sub-region has gradually turned into an arena for foreign powers. In the mean time, the international cooperation for poverty alleviation in Lancang-Mekong sub-region is plagued by the turmoil of democratization, environmental issues, and lack of systematic planning and evaluation. The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism formed in 2016 is one of the cooperation mechanisms pushed by China for closer cooperation with neighboring countries. International poverty-alleviation cooperation is one of the priorities in this mechanism. In view of the current problems in international poverty-alleviation cooperation in Lancang-Mekong sub-region, in the future, measures should be takes as follows in international poverty-alleviation cooperation under Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism: actively advocating the new poverty-alleviation ideas of cooperation, green poverty-alleviation, and joint efforts of governments, enterprises, NGOs, and society; creating targeted poverty-alleviation cooperation platforms; seeking bilateral and multilateral balances and a balance with current cooperation mechanisms; focusing on the development new poverty-alleviation programs.
|
|
Received: 15 February 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘稚,卢光盛.大湄公河次区域合作发展报告（2016）[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2016.62.
[2] 张继业,钮荀生,试述安倍政府的湄公河次区域开发援助战略[J].现代国际关系,2016,（3）：31-39.
[3] 商务部.日本承诺拨款74亿美元开发湄公河流域基础设施[DB/OL].http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/i/jyjl/j/201204/20120408084844.html.
[4] 黄河,杨海燕.区域性公共产品与澜湄合作机制[J].深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2017,（1）：132.
[5] 亚洲开发银行官网.Significant progress has been achieved in terms of implementing projects under GMS program since 1992[DB/OL].http://www.adb.org/countries/gms/sector-activ-ities.
[6] 孙政才.大湄公河次区域农业合作前景广阔[DB/OL].新华网.http//news.xinhuanet.com/politios/2007-04/11/content_ 5960209.htm.
[7] 刘稚.大湄公河次区域合作与发展研究报告（2010）[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2011. 6.
[8] 云南网.去年赴泰国旅游的中国游客达1亿人次超2万人经昆曼大通道自驾入泰[DB/OL].yn.yunnan.cn/html/2015-06-26.
[9] Jayant Menon. Building Blocks or Stumbling Blocks? The GMS and AFTA in Asia[J].ASEAN Economic Bulletin,2007,(2):256.
[10] 中华人民共和国驻柬埔寨王国使馆经商处.2010年上半年中国对柬埔寨援外培训情况[DB/OL]. http://cb.mofcom.gov.cn/article/jmxw/201008/20100807062575.shtml.
[11] 彼得·乔德里.少数民族发展[R].（2012年“减贫与发展高层论坛——包容性发展与减贫”背景报告之一）,http://www.iprcc.org.cn/Home/Index/skip/cid/2450.html.
[12] 王庆忠.日本介入大湄公河次区域合作及中国的战略应对[J].当代世界,2014,(5): 67-69.
[13] 联合国社会发展研究院.反对贫困与不平等——结构变迁、社会政策与政治.郭烁译.香港中文大学中国服务研究中心,http://www.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/PaperCollection/Details.aspx ?id=8525.
[14] 李晨阳.澜沧江—湄公河合作：机遇、挑战与对策[J].学术观察,2016,(1): 24.
[15] 周民良.贫困、环境与可持续发展[J].中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）,2007,(5): 2-3.
[16] 刘稚,卢光盛.大湄公河次区域合作的新发展（2012-2013）[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2013.17.
[17] 黄河.区域公共产品与区域合作：解决GMS国家环境问题的新视角[J].国际观察,2010,(2):74.
[18] 卢光盛,金珍.“澜湄合作机制”建设：原因、困难与路径[J].战略决策等研究,2016,（6）：33.
[19] 吴忠.中国国际扶贫中心致力于国际减贫交流合作[N].人民日报海外版.2010-10-02（2）.
[20] 郭延军.澜湄合作的新思路和新路径[R].在云南大学召开的“周边外交研究中心学术委员会会议暨中国周边外交与周边安全高峰论坛”演讲,2017.1.14.
[21] 新华社.澜沧江—湄公河国家才能合作联合声明[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.com/2016-03/23/c_1118421803.htm,登陆时间,2017.4.20. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 34 
