|
|
The Classical Origin of Modern Enlightenment Subjects |
LIU Sen-lin |
Philosophy and Social Development College of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100 |
|
|
Abstract Dialectics of Enlightenment uses modern subjectivity, tool rationality, and interest exchange principles to interpret Homer’s epics. It diminishes the role of gods but highlights rational choices of humans, and even takes Odysseus as the prototype of modern bourgeoisie. It emphasizes sadness and fear, and anger and slaughter out of these feelings, revealing negative emotions and subjectivity are inseparable. Besides, it stresses reconciliation between the classical subject and nature. Through this interpretation, Dialectics of Enlightenment extends enlightenment criticism to the strategies of ancient Greek mythologies at the beginning of Western civilization, which can be suspected as over-interpreting the classics and obviously make the interpretation quite modern, and at the same time pays homage to the classical subject of classical characteristics, revealing the classical subject is more lovely, real and hopeful than modern bourgeoisie. It is biased only to criticize Dialectics of Enlightenment for using modern logic to interpret classic spirit. We should also see the positive sides of this strategy: it returns to the original state, presents the real look of human life, and highlights ills of modern civilization. It is of positive significance to trace the enlightenment subject to Odysseus.
|
Received: 10 November 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (德)霍克海默,阿多诺.启蒙辩证法[M].渠敬东,曹卫东译,上海:上海人民出版社,2003. [2] Konstantinos Rantis,Psychoanalyse Uud “Dialektik der Aufklarung” , zu Klampen Verlag 2001,S.40. [3] (美)安东尼·朗.心灵与自我的希腊模式[M].何博超译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.15,30. [4] (古希腊)荷马.奥德赛[M].陈中梅译,南京:译林出版社,2003. [5] 陈中梅.荷马的启示:从命运观到认识论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009.10,11. [6] (英)加斯帕·格里芬.荷马史诗中的生与死[M].刘淳译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015. [7] (法)让-皮埃尔·韦尔南,皮埃尔·维达尔-纳凯.古希腊神话与悲剧[M].张苗,杨淑岚译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2016. [8] (美)皮平.作为哲学问题的现代主义——论对欧洲高雅文化的不满[M].阎嘉译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.167. [9] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995. [10] 马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1958.514. [11] (美)伯纳德特.弓弦与竖琴——从柏拉图解读<奥德塞>[M].程志敏译.北京:华夏出版社,2003. [12] 马丁·杰.法兰克福学派史[M].单世联译.广州:广东人民出版社,1996. |
|
|
|