经典的价值——“大学通识教育联盟”四校的传统文化课程评析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (482 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Taking the “University General Education Alliance” as a study object, the article reviews general education reforms of Peking University, Tsinghua University, Fudan University and Sun Yat-sen University. Comparison and study of the characteristics of Chinese traditional culture curriculum in these four universities shows: they all boast adequate Chinese traditional culture courses in humanities, but differ in course arrangement; most courses use similar topics and teaching methods and have large classes and overload credits demands for undergraduates; traditional culture curriculum has large potential as hidden curriculum. To improve cultural qualities of Chinese university students, firstly, we need to make Chinese traditional culture curriculum the core curriculum in general education and a basic requirement for undergraduates. Secondly, we need to bring the idea of “integration of theory and history” into curriculum arrangement and make sure the core curriculum plays a substantial role. Thirdly, we need to involve reading, lecturing and discussing in teaching, explore and integrate education resources, and improve general curriculum system, so as to help college students foster a sense of national and cultural identity and share a common core value.

Key words： University General Education Alliance "four universities" traditional culture classics core curriculum

Received: 15 January 2016

PACS:

G642

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Ya-qun
	FENG Yin

Cite this article:

ZHANG Ya-qun,FENG Yin. Value of Classics：Chinese Traditional Culture Curriculum Review of University General Education Alliance[J]. , 2016, 33(3): 148-155.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2016/V33/I3/148

[1] [美]约瑟夫·斯科特·李.大学院校中的核心文本——柏拉图的斐德罗篇与孔子的论语[J].张亚群,蔡培瑜译.大学教育科学,2014,(1).
[2] 教育部.关于加强大学生文化素质教育的若干意见（教高司[1998]2号） [EB/OL].http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/1200/22598/22615/22796/2006/3/qi655152130261360023475-0.htm.1998-04-10 .
[3] 教育部.完善中华优秀传统文化教育指导纲要（教社科[2014]3号）[N].中国教育报,2014-04-02(3).
[4] 关海庭、宋鑫、何山.构建以素质教育为取向的跨学科通选课程体系[A].台湾交通大学通识教育委员会编.“自由学艺与传统：通过东西方核心经典作品研读来深入对话与体现制度”学术研讨会论文集[C].台湾新竹,2008-11:77-78.
[5] 孙向晨.直面经典——复旦大学通识教育中“哲学经典”课程的建设和教学的探索[A].台湾交通大学通识教育委员会编.“自由学艺与传统：通过东西方核心经典作品研读来深入对话与体现制度”学术研讨会论文集[C].台湾新竹,2008-11:71.
[6] 张亚群.作为通识课程的核心文本教学[N].厦门大学报,2014-06-30(1).
[7] 甘阳.通三统[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2014:74;86;114;116-122.
[8] 甘阳.大学通识教育的纲与目[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2007,(2).
[9] 李曼丽.通识教育：一种大学教育观[M].北京：清华大学出版社,1999.260.
[10] 刘易斯.失去灵魂的卓越-哈佛是如何忘记教育宗旨的[M].侯定凯译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.44.
[11] 刘家和.史学和经学[J].北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）,1985,(3).
[12] 柳诒徵.“出版者的话”[A].中国文化史[C].上海：东方出版中心,2007.
[13] 镇江市图书馆影响中国的镇江人[M].镇江：江苏大学出版社,2012.157.
[14] 李曼丽.哈佛核心课程述评[J].比较教育研究,1998,(2).
[15] 张亚群.中国近代大学通识教育与创新人才培养[M].福州：福建教育出版社,2015.315.
[16] 陈思敏.全球化语境中台湾高校通识教育对大学生价值观教育的启示——以传统文化之传承为视角[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2011,(1).
[17] 王伟廉.中国大学教学运行机制研究[M].广州：广东高等教育出版社,2005.37-40.