|
|
|
| Coordination between Compilation of Civil Code and Commercial Legislation |
| QIAN Yu-lin, GUO Xiao |
| Law School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225127 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Syncretism of civil law and commercial law established in the expert suggestion on general principles of civil law results from the notion of unity which has been popular over the years. But this kind of combination is not a solution to the issue of “merchants’ special needs” both in principles and rule design. What particularly requires commercial law cannot be regulated in civil law in the form of provisos as it is parallel with civil law and they are independent from each other. Considering the fact that civil law and criminal law are overlapped and each has its specific scope of regulation, it would be the best choice to apply civil law in overlapped areas and to single out specific parts to formulate general principles of commercial law.
|
|
Received: 06 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 施天涛.民法典能够实现民商合一吗?[J].中国法律评论,2015,(4):24-25.
[2] 詹姆斯.戈德雷.现代合同理论的哲学起源[M].张家勇译.北京:法律出版社,2006.250.
[3] 王保树.商事法的理念与理念上的商事法[A].王保树主编.商事法论集[C].北京:法律出版社,1997.
[4] 钱玉林.商法的价值,功能及其定位[J].中国法学,2001,(5):34.
[5] 卡纳里斯.德国商法[M].杨继译.北京:法律出版社,2006.667.
[6] 松波仁一郎.日本商法论[M].秦瑞玠等译.北京:中国政法人学出版社,2005.176.
[7] 张玲.韩国商法.[M].吴日焕译.北京:中国政法人学出版社,1999.89.
[8] 周旺生.论法律但书[J].中国法学,1991,(4):55-56.
[9] 蒋大兴.论民法典(民法总则)对商行为之调整[J].比较法研究,2015,(4):18-19.
[10] 王保树.商事通则:超越民商合一与民商分立[J].法学研究,2005,(1):38-39. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 33 
