Abstract：The sustainable development of governance practices, such as deliberative democracy, not only requires perfect institutional norms and standardized operation procedures as guarantee, but also needs the external drive of deliberative practice performance. How is the political legal function of deliberative democracy practice in our country? Based on the data of the questionnaire survey of grassroots officials in 16 provinces and 36 cities, this paper studies the practice of deliberative democracy of grassroots officials and its influence mechanism on public satisfaction with the government. The study shows that deliberative democracy at grassroots level has following problems: grassroots officials are not consistent in their perception and practice of deliberative democracy; deliberative democracy is not regularly practiced, and it is significantly less actively practiced than passively practiced; deliberative democracy is practiced in limited areas; The public does not have a high opinion of the practice of deliberative democracy. Apart from these problems, the study also have following findings: importance attached to deliberative democracy practice significantly improves the public satisfaction with the government; participation in decision-making hearings and online deliberation improve the public satisfaction with the government, while government hotlines, officials’ regular reception of public visits, participation in evaluation, and letters and visits of complaints over the work of the government have no significant impact, and face-to-face communication with grassroots officials reduces satisfaction with the government; the more fields where deliberative democracy is practiced, the higher satisfaction people have with the government; in particular, deliberation in the negotiation of land expropriation and relocation, public budget, people’s livelihood and welfare and investment attraction significantly increases people’s satisfaction with the government. People’s satisfaction with the practice of deliberative democracy not only directly enhances people’s satisfaction with the government, but also an important intermediary to influence the satisfaction with the government by the importance of deliberation practice, approaches for deliberation practice (decision-making hearing), and the participation of deliberation practice.
聂伟, 陈家喜. 基层干部协商民主实践对政府满意度影响机制的实证分析[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2020, 37(1): 110-119.
NIE Wei, CHEN Jia-xi. An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative Democracy Practice of Grassroots Cadres and Its Influence on Government Satisfaction. , 2020, 37(1): 110-119.
[1] True R.Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits[J].Comparative Political Studies, 2017, 50(3):329-361. [2] Bessette J.Deliberative Democracy:The Majority Principle in Republican Government[A]. in Robert Gold-win and William Shambra, How Democratic is the Constitution?[C].Washington:American Enterprise Institute,1980.102-116. [3] Miller D.Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups? [A]. in Dentreves M.P.,Democracy as Public Deliberation[C].Manchester:Manchester University Press, 2002.201. [4] Valadez J.M. Deliberative Democracy,Political Legitimacy,and Self-Democracy in Multicultural Societies[M]. USA: Westview Press, 2001.30. [5] Cooke M.Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy[J].Political Studies,2000,48(5):947-969. [6] Cohen J.Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy[A].in Bohman,J., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics[C].Massachusette:The MIT Press,1997.67. [7] 詹姆斯·博曼,威廉·雷吉.协商民主:论理性与政治[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2006.201. [8] 陈家刚.协商民主:概念、要素与价值[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005,(3):54-60. [9] 尉建文,谢镇荣.灾后重建中的政府满意度——基于汶川地震的经验发现[J].社会学研究,2015,(1):97-113. [10] 潘荣江,陈朋.选举民主与协商民主共生发展:乡村的实践与价值——浙江泽国镇的案例启示[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2009,(4):71-77. [11] 马得勇,张华.制度创新中的价值与细节:三个基层民主创新案例的实证分析[J].探索,2018,(1):38-51. [12] 张师伟. 地方治理体系现代化过程中的协商民主[J].晋阳学刊,2016,(3):110-117. [13] 何包钢,吴进进.公共协商的政治合法性功能——基于连氏市民公共服务满意度调查[J].浙江社会科学,2016,(9):26-38. [14] James O.Performance Measures and Democracy:Information Effects on Citizens in Field and Laboratory Experiments[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2011,21(3): 399-418. [15] Van Ryzin GG.Pieces of a Puzzle: Linking Government Performance,Citizen Satisfaction,and Trust[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2007,30(4):521-535. [16] 辛秘秘,何增华.乡镇治理水平、政治性社会资本与居民政府满意度关系研究——基于中国乡镇民主与治理调查数据库的实证研究[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(5):31-38. [17] Ho T.A.,Cho W. Government Communication Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Police Performance:A Larg-e——Scale Survey Study[J].Public Administration Revi-ew,2016,77(2):228-239. [18] Lind E.A., Tyler T.R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice[M].New York: Plenum,1988.141-172. [19] Tyler T.R., Blader S. Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement[M].Philadelphia:Psychology Press,2000.233. [20] 官永彬. 民主与民生:民主参与影响公共服务满意度的实证研究[J].中国经济问题,2015,(2):26-37. [21] 郑建君. 政治参与、政治沟通对公共服务满意度影响机制的性别差异——基于 6159 份中国公民调查数据的实证分析[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(5):164-171. [22] 李强彬,谢星全.中国特色公众协商途径与协商民主实施满意度——基于12省市领导干部的问卷调查[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(1):120-124. [23] 陈怀平. 协商民主的实践理念探析[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2014,(2):54-58. [24] 聂伟. 党委干部协商民主认知对协商实践及效果评价的影响——基于地方官员问卷调查结果的分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2016,(9):62-76. [25] 张等文,陈佳.中国基层协商民主的实践困境与化解策略[J].理论与现代化,2015,(4):83-88. [26] 加布里埃尔·A·阿尔蒙德,西德尼·维巴.公民文化——五个国家的政治态度和民主制度[M].张明澍译.北京:商务印书馆,2014. [27] 马得勇,王正绪.民主、公正还是绩效?——中国地方政府合法性及其来源分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2012,(5):122-138. [28] 薛冰,郑萍.以商谈求共识:行政决策听证中公共意愿的形成[J].北京行政学院学报,2011,(2):38-42. [29] 赵海艳. 公共决策中网络协商民主的形式及效能分析[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,(4):125-133. [30] Chen J.Popular Political Support in Urban China[M]. Washinton,D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press &Stanford:Standford University Press,2004.161-162. [31] 胡荣. 农民上访与政治信任的流失[J].社会学研究,2007,(3):39-55. [32] 陈家刚,陈奕敏.地方治理中的参与式预算——关于浙江温岭市新河镇改革的案例研究[J].公共管理学报,2007,(3):76-83. [33] 杨弘,郭雨佳.农村基层协商民主制度化发展的困境与对策——以农村一事一议制度完善为视角[J].政治学研究,2015,(3): 20-27. [34] 唐庆鹏. 网络协商民主的成长轨迹及障碍研究[J].当代世界与社会主义,2015,(5):160-164.
2020, Vol. 37 
粤公网安备44030502007936号