Abstract:There are flaws with the double error theory in the theory of criminal law as there are real errors and false errors. The real double errors includes double errors in crime constituent elements and double errors in affirmative defense. What appear together with the double errors of crime constituent elements are pure constituent errors and negative prohibition errors, or negative constituent errors and pure prohibition errors. What appear together with double errors related to affirmative defense are pure permission constituent errors and negative constituent errors, or negative permission constituent errors and pure prohibition errors, or two opposite evaluation errors, or two negative errors concerning the facts in affirmative defense. What happen together with false double errors are permission constituent errors and permission errors, which should not be called double errors. Real double errors refer only to simultaneous, negative, and important false imagination when watched independently.
(德)洛塔尔·库伦. 刑法学中双重错误理论的真相和选择[J]. 《深圳大学学报》(人文社科版), 2019, 36(3): 80-85.
Lothar Cullen. Truth and Choice of Double Error Theory in Criminal Law. , 2019, 36(3): 80-85.