Abstract：Husserl’s discussion of the origin of geometry is ɑn example of his pursuit of the ideal of universal philosophy. According to Husserl, Galileo’s ideal of the mathematization of nature is merely ɑ finite explanation of the origin of geometry, and the geometry before Galileo is only a finite and closed apriori principles. Thus, Husserl explores the origin of geometry, in fact viewing it as ɑn “overall acquisition of spiritual achievement” and pursuing the full-time effectiveness and general normativity of science. However, due to Husserl’s evidence could not escape the intentionality of individual objects, he has to place the origin of geometry in the life-world, which has drawn much criticism. Jacques Klein startes from the objectivity of concepts, through the connection and distinction between intention prima and intention secunda, explores the symbolic process of Descartes’ unification of algebra and geometry, and rediscoveres the origin of geometry, especially the process of the formalization of mathematical symbols. In this sense, Jacques Klein surpasses Husserl. However, Klein’s exploration raises a new question: Has he completed the formalization? In fact, to seek the origin of formalization, we still need to return to Husserl, especially Husserl’s distinction between Ausdruck and Anzeinchen. In Husserl’s view, the emergence of Anzeinchen represents the formation of purely linguistic generalization, and the essential possibility of this purely linguistic generalization is borne by pure concepts. It is precisely in this sense that Jacques Klein reconstructes formalization through the process of purifying of mathematical symbols which surpasses his tutor Husserl.
黄蕾. 从普遍哲学的理想到形式化的起源：雅克·克莱恩与胡塞尔的分野及其超越[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2026, 43(3): 153-160.
HUANG Lei. From the Ideal of Universal Philosophy to the Origin of Formalization:The Divergence Between Jacques Klein and Husserl and Jacques Klein’s Surpassment. , 2026, 43(3): 153-160.
[1] (德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.几何学的起源[A].(法)雅克·德里达.胡塞尔《几何学的起源》引论[M].方向红译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004. [2] 张庆熊. 译者的话[A].(德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988. [3] (德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊译.上海:上海译文出版社,1988. [4] (德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.作为严格科学的哲学[M].倪梁康译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.69. [5] (法)雅克·德里达.胡塞尔哲学中的发生问题[M].于奇智译.北京:商务印书馆,2019. [6] (法)雅克·德里达.胡塞尔《几何学的起源》引论[M].方向红译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004. [7] Jacob Klein.The World of Physics and the “Natural” Wo-rld[M].trans. David R. Lachterman, in Lectures and Essa-ys ed. Robert B.Williamson and Elliott Zuckerman,Anna-polis, Md.: St. John’s Press,1985. [8] (美)伯特·霍普金斯.雅克·克莱恩的哲学成就[J].朱光亚译,黄蕾校.武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(2):127-133. [9] 黄蕾.回归,抑或超越:一种柏拉图意义上的形式化演进[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(6):9-15. [10] (德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.逻辑研究(第二卷第一部分)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2015. [11] (法)雅克·德里达.声音与现象[M].杜小真译.北京:商务印书馆,1999. [12] Jacques Derrida.Husserls Weg in die Geschichte am Leitfaden der Geometrie-Ein Kommentar zur Beilage III der “Krisis”[M].Wilhelm Fink Verlag,1987.102. [13] 朱光亚. 现象学视域下的符号与形式化的发生[J].江汉论坛,2025,(7):78-84. [14] 方向红. 生成与解构——德里达早期现象学批判疏论[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2006.151. [15] (美)伯特·霍普金斯.分析哲学与欧陆哲学的先天不可贯通性[J].朱光亚译.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,(6):1-8.
2026, Vol. 43 
粤公网安备44030502007936号