Individual Value and Generation Mechanisms of Virtual Public Cultural Space
CHEN Bo1, YAN Shu-ning2
1. School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072; 2. National Institute of Cultural Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072
Abstract:The virtual public cultural space demonstrates a morphological structure and operational mechanism that are different from those of the traditional real space, so it has special value manifestations in meeting the people’s spiritual and cultural needs. Based on a cyber ethnographic study of two online reading communities, Douban groups and WeChat group chats, this paper analyzes the positive value that virtual public cultural space bring to people and the mechanism of its realization. The process of community members’ entry, participation, and movement within virtual public cultural space shapes and sustains the triple configuration of communication, memory and performance spaces. Community members obtain security value in the process of interacting with the communication space, identity value in the process of interacting with the memory space, and self-realization in the process of interacting with the performance space. The consensus of rules jointly constructed by community members is the base point of value generation, the interaction between private life and public sphere form the driving force of value generation, and the pursuit of ideal self becomes the value objective of virtual public cultural space. Cultural practices represented by reading reflect people’s developmental needs and ideal goals, and virtual public cultural space provide supporting conditions for this process. The core essence of guiding the construction of virtual public cultural space lies in highlighting and giving full play to people’s dominant position, so as to meet their essential demands for self-development. In this way, virtual public cultural space will become a new engine driving individual growth and social progress.
陈波, 延书宁. 虚拟公共文化空间的个体价值及生成机制[J]. 《深圳大学学报》(人文社科版), 2025, 42(2): 45-55.
CHEN Bo, YAN Shu-ning. Individual Value and Generation Mechanisms of Virtual Public Cultural Space. , 2025, 42(2): 45-55.
[1] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报,2024-07-22(001). [2] 阮青. 价值哲学[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2004.63. [3] Johnson S.Interface Culture: How New Technology Trans-forms the Way We Create and Communicate[M].New York: Basic Books,1997.18. [4] Benedikt M.Cyberspace: First Steps[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1993.1. [5] Rheingold H.The Virtual Community:Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,2000.1. [6] Turkle S.Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet[M].New York: Simon & Schuster Inc,1997.10. [7] 张果. 网络空间论[D].武汉:华中科技大学博士学位论文,2013. [8] 陈波,宋诗雨.虚拟文化空间生产及其维度设计研究——基于列斐伏尔“空间生产”理论[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(1):35-43. [9] 贺怡,傅才武.数字文化空间下公共文化服务体系建设的创新方向与改革路径[J].国家图书馆学刊,2021,30(2):105-113. [10] 赵宇翔,张妍,夏翠娟,等.数字人文视域下文化记忆机构价值共创研究及实践述评[J].中国图书馆学报,2023, 49(1):99-117. [11] 连婷婷,袁曦临.基于互动仪式链理论的虚拟阅读社区研究——以豆瓣读书会小组为例[J].图书馆工作与研究,2023,(8):59-64+89. [12] Sedo R.Readers in Reading Groups: An Online Survey of Face-to-Face and Virtual Book Clubs[J].Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,2003,9(1):66-90. [13] 王喆,邓雅萱,杜馥琪.数字游民的异托邦社会空间生产实践——以浙江安吉DNA数字游民公社为例[J].未来传播,2023,30(5):42-51. [14] 李妍. 从“认同”到“承认”:城市空间正义的生成逻辑[J].求索,2024,(3):172-179. [15] 王勇,李广斌.裂变与再生:苏南乡村公共空间转型研究[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(7):112-118. [16] 陈波,穆晨.互联网条件下虚拟公共文化空间模式研究[J].艺术百家,2019,35(1):61-69. [17] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.社会的构成:结构化理论纲要[M].李康,李猛译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016. [18] 彭凯平,刘钰,曹春梅,等.虚拟社会心理学:现实,探索及意义[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(7):933-943. [19] Deleuze G, Guattari F.A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia[M].Minneapolis: University of Minne-sota Press,1987.12-13. [20] 刘艳.赛博空间语境中的社会化阅读:身体重构、游牧空间、传播进路及其迷阵与反思[J].图书馆理论与实践,2019,(1):37-42+48. [21] Lefebvre H.The Production of Space[M].Translated by Do-nald Nicholson-Smith, Oxford: Blackwell Ltd.,1991. [22] Kozinets V.E-tribalized Marketing?: The Strategic Im-plications of Virtual Communities of Consumption[J].European Management Journal,1999,17(3):252-264. [23] House N,Churchill E.Technologies of Memory:Key Issues and Critical Perspectives[J].Memory Studies,2008,1(3):295-310. [24] 韩婕,李红涛,刘于思.数字“瘟疫年纪事”:连接性见证与灾难马拉松的公共记忆[J].国际新闻界,2023,45(1):106-131. [25] Goffman E.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life[M]. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh Social Science Re-search Centre,1956. [26] Bullingham L, Vasconcelos C.The Presentation of Self in the Online World’:Goffman and the Study of Online Id-entities[J].Journal of Information Science,2013,39(1):101-112. [27] 成伯清.当代情感体制的社会学探析[J].中国社会科学,2017,(5):83-101+207. [28] 姜婷婷,许艳闰.窄化的信息世界:国外信息茧房、选择性接触与回音室研究进展[J].图书情报知识,2021,38(5):134-144. [29] 张勇. 论社会资本的社区公共空间向度[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,34(6):153-160. [30] 汪广荣. 虚拟社会与人的主体性[M].合肥:合肥工业大学出版社,2015.114. [31] Kerpelman J,Pittman J, Lamke L.Toward a Microprocess Perspective on Adolescent Identity Development:An Identity Control Theory Approach[J].Journal of Adolesc-ent Research,1997,12(3):325-346. [32] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.现代性与自我认同:晚期现代中的自我与社会[M].夏璐译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.49-50. [33] 李明,杜建政.旧事为何重提?——忆旧、叙事与自传记忆的功能研究及其整合[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(10):1732-1745.