Abstract：Guofeng games, defined as digital games centered on Chinese cultural values and designed to generate experience through rule-based and interactive structures, have increasingly become a significant medium for embedding Chinese culture into digital environments. Cultural values do not inherently possess experiential qualities; such qualities emerge only when abstract concepts are transformed into actionable structures.“Spatial translation” refers to the reconstruction of the value relations and behavioral logics of Chinese culture into situational conditions, rule systems, and choice frameworks within game space, enabling them to directly shape player actions. On this basis, an experience formation mechanism is established. It is structured around spatial configurations and driven by iterative action loops: within immersive contexts, culture enters experience in perceptual form; within rule systems, it is transformed into actionable logics that players can infer; and through sustained practice, it is continuously validated and accumulated via behavioral outcomes.The avatar functions as a key mediator, integrating operations into a process of action grounded in subjectivity, thereby endowing feedback with emotional significance and allowing it to become stabilized as experiential structures over time. Consequently, cultural identity no longer derives primarily from symbolic representation or narrative transmission, but emerges through the iterative cycle of “perception-action-feedback.” Spatial translation thus constitutes an intermediary mechanism linking Chinese cultural values with individual identity, transforming culture from visible representation into actionable experiential practice.
李鹏飞. 中华文化价值认同的生成：国风游戏中的空间转译机制[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2026, 43(4): 39-47.
LI Peng-fei. The Formation of Identification with Chinese Cultural Values: The Mechanism of Spatial Translation in Guofeng Games. , 2026, 43(4): 39-47.
[1] 彭佳,赵俊利.游戏复魅:数智时代中华文化符号的电子灵韵与传播意涵[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2026,55(1):126-134. [2] 刘彤,黄煜婕.叙事重构·符号转译·新质生产力驱动:《黑神话:悟空》的多维阐释[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2025,(4):97-107. [3] 曾楠. 中华文明韧性研究的学术检视:生成、进路与自主建构[J].理论学刊,2026,(2):153-162. [4] 宋鸿立,赵志恒,宋雨倩.视觉重生:中华元典多模态跨文化隐喻的转译研究[J].新闻与传播评论,2025,78(6):112-124. [5] 史安斌,朱泓宇.国际传播中的“文化间性”:围绕“数智华流”的探究[J].新闻与写作,2025,(7):5-14. [6] 刘强,乔慧.21世纪以来中国动画电影的民族性、现代性与工业美学[J].民族艺术研究,2020,33(5):29-37. [7] 战迪,姚振轩.视听传播的元宇宙想象:身体、空间与流动的共同体[J].视听理论与实践,2022,(6):77-84+91. [8] Zhou W, Xue Y, Wang S, et al.Cognitive Load-Based Multi-Level Annotation Model for Knowledge Acquisition in Heritage Games[J].npj Heritage Science,2025,13(1):559. [9] 马溯川,郭越.数字生存中的沉浸行动:拟真游戏中青年玩家的技术-需求-空间耦合机制[J].中国青年研究,2026,(3):61-69+119. [10] 赵瑜佩,朱晴雯,王润声.从机制美学到文化蒸馏:国产游戏出海传播的模型建构与路径阐释[J].现代出版,2026,(5):24-38. [11] 王椿升. 游戏艺术中的虚拟文化空间建构——以米哈游《崩坏:星穹铁道》为例[J].文化创新比较研究,2025,9(35):101-105. [12] 冯梦瑶. 仪式传播与非遗传承:文化空间逻辑及其数字转化路径[J].南京社会科学,2025,(11):178-188. [13] 马忠,黄静.中华文化国际传播的跨媒介叙事:生动样态、现实挑战与创新模式[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2026,57(1):57-66. [14] 黄旦,孙玮,叶祝弟,等.数字沟通时代的媒介研究——六十年后再思《理解媒介》[J/OL].探索与争鸣,1-42[2026-06-18].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1208.C.20250110.1447.034. [15] 凡婷婷,王琦,刘才辅,等.游戏:带动文化出海的全新平台——网络游戏跨文化传播的协同路径探赜[J].新闻爱好者,2025,(10):11-17. [16] (法)亨利·列斐伏尔.空间的生产[M].刘怀玉,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2022.58-59. [17] 杨增岽. 根植中华优秀传统文化构建中国自主知识体系的几个问题[J].广东社会科学,2026,(2):67-77. [18] Li P F, Qi F, Ye Z.Influence of Avatar Identification on the Attraction of Virtual Reality Games: Survey Study[J]. JMIR Publications Formative Research,2024,(8):e56704. [19] 刘汉波. 《黑神话:悟空》的“后西游叙事”、遍历空间实践与跨文化传播[J].云南社会科学,2024,(6):175-185. [20] 于鸽.生成式人工智能场景下中华文化符号的建构与治理[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2026,46(1):169-180+188. [21] 刘佳佳. 数字游戏赋能中华优秀传统文化数智化传播:耦合逻辑、问题透视与优化路径[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,(1):26-35. [22] 黄永林. “新大众文艺”的生产与传播机制论析[J].文学评论,2026,(1):5-17. [23] Li P, Xiong N, Li J.The Manifestation of Virtual Body Ownership in the Metaverse: A Cross-Platform Study on the Impact of Multisensory Integration on Presence and Flow Experience[J].Human-Centric Computing and Inf-ormation Sciences,2026,(16):27.
2026, Vol. 43 
粤公网安备44030502007936号