Abstract：With the development of the domestic industry, the role of baby-caring domestic workers has changed from the traditional sense of simple housework replacement to the increasingly professional emotional workers under the concept of scientific childcare. According to the field investigation in Wuhan, the study found that the emotional labor roles of baby-caring domestic workers can be divided into four types according to the degree of emotional involvement and professionalism: “high professional high emotion”, “high professional low emotion”, “low professional high emotion”, and “low professional low emotion”. Among different emotional labor role types, there are significant differences in professional identity, labor autonomy, job stability and customer evaluation of baby-caring domestic workers. “High professional and high emotional” baby-caring domestic workers can not only provide high-quality baby-care domestic services but also avoid emotional alienation. The mechanism of shaping the differentiated emotional labor of baby-caring domestic workers mainly includes the development status and social recognition of the domestic industry, the professional orientation of domestic workers, employment orientation and the relationship between employers and employees. The trust between employers and domestic workers will help domestic workers give play to their labor autonomy, make them obtain positive emotional labor experience, and then promote the construction of a stable employment relationship between the two sides. In the future, we should strengthen the psychological counseling and social care for the group of domestic workers, recognize their labor value, and further guide the development of the domestic industry towards standardization, specialization and professionalization.
[1] 艾媒咨询. 2024年中国家政服务行业发展状况及消费洞察报告[EB/OL].https://finance.sina.com.cn/wm/2024-05-23/doc-inawemww2526993.shtml,2024-05-28. [2] (美)阿莉·拉塞尔·霍克希尔德.心灵的整饰:人类情感的商业化[M].成伯清,淡卫军,王佳鹏译.上海:上海三联书店,2020.21,182. [3] 田林楠. 情感劳动的“两副面孔”——从霍克希尔德到哈特与奈格里[J].社会学评论,2022,10(2):88-103. [4] Grandey A A, Fisk G M, Steiner D D.Must “Service With A Smile” Be Stressful? The Moderating Role of Personal Control for American and French Employees[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2005,90(5):893-904. [5] 章文光. 家政“兴农”的深意、特点与前景[J].人民论坛,2022,(5):40-43. [6] 王晓莹,刘林平.家政工人的职业素养:问题与影响因素——基于访谈资料的质性研究[J].学海,2020,(2):100-106. [7] 梁萌. 强控制与弱契约:互联网技术影响下的家政业用工模式研究[J].妇女研究论丛,2017,(5):47-59. [8] 萨支红,张梦吉,刘思琪等.家政工生存状况研究:基于北京、济南被访者驱动抽样调查[J].妇女研究论丛,2020,(4):56-72. [9] 刘育婷,肖索未.“干活时把雇主当家人,相处时把自己当外人”——住家家政工的雇主关系及情感劳动研究[J].妇女研究论丛,2020,(4):73-87. [10] 周群英. “家里外人”:家政工身份转换的人类学研究 ——以阈限理论为视角[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,37(2):88-96. [11] 梅笑,涂炯.效率与温情:大病照护中的情感劳动何以可能[J].妇女研究论丛,2021,(3):53-67. [12] 沈锦浩.情境化差序型情感劳动——基于大病照护的观察[J].探索与争鸣,2024,(2):111-121+179. [13] 梁萌,吕游,刘万丽.嵌入与消弭:中国家政业职业化实践研究[J].妇女研究论丛,2020,(5):28-41. [14] 吴心越. 市场化的照顾工作:性别、阶层与亲密关系劳动[J].社会学评论,2019,7(1):75-86. [15] 刘中一. 从奶妈、保姆到育婴师:私人托育的历史演进[J].河北学刊,2020,40(4):191-197. [16] 梁萌. 从多元到整合:我国家政工职业身份公众认同建构的组织化实践[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,40(5):145-164. [17] 邢朝国,周群英.照料劳动的价值评估与定价:对家政工涨工资的实证研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,40(5):165-188. [18] 刘思达. 职业自主性与国家干预——西方职业社会学研究述评[J].社会学研究,2006,(1):197-221. [19] 徐依婷. 城市育婴家政工的双重母职困境研究[D].南京:河海大学博士学位论文,2022.39. [20] 梅笑. 情感劳动中的积极体验:深层表演、象征性秩序与劳动自主性[J].社会,2020,40(2):111-136.
2025, Vol. 42 
粤公网安备44030502007936号