Abstract:General trust is an important measure for social progress. Rapid social transformation and frequent social mobility constitute the structural background for the formation and evolution of general trust in China. From the perspective of rational choice theory and based on the 2017 China General Social Survey data (CGSS2017), this paper uses multiple linear regression, interaction effect analysis and second-order interaction analysis to study the influence of communication perimeter on the generational difference in general trust and the regulatory effect of the Internet use in this regard. The results show that there are distinct generational differences in general trust, and the communication perimeter and the Internet use are important factors to generational effect of general trust. To be specific, the general trust of different generations in China has experienced an L-shaped process of rapid decline at first and slow rise later. In the age bracket from the pre-40s generation to the post-80s generation, the general trust level of each generation is on the decline, while the general trust of the post-90s generation is somewhat on the rise in comparison with the post-80s generation. The expansion of communication perimeter among different generations is an important reason for the constant decline of general trust. The larger the communication perimeter, the lower the general trust level, and the decline of general trust level caused by the expansion of communication perimeter is more significant in the post-60s, post-70s and post-80s generations. The wide use of the Internet increases the weakening effect of communication perimeter on general trust. The longer the Internet time, the stronger the weakening effect of communication perimeter on general trust. Chinese people prefer strong relationships. If weak relationships in social networks cannot be transformed into strong relationships, the expansion of communication perimeter will be a burden for the development of general trust.
韩彦超. 互联网使用、交往半径与一般信任的世代效应[J]. 《深圳大学学报》(人文社科版), 2021, 38(6): 114-124.
HAN Yan-chao. The Internet Use, Communication Perimeter and Generational Difference in General Trust. , 2021, 38(6): 114-124.
[1] Jan D, Kenneth N.Predicting Cross-national Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?[J].European Sociological Review, 2005,21(4):311-327. [2] Uslaner E M.The Moral Foundation of Trust[M].Cambridge: Cambridgr University Press,2002.217-248. [3] Stephen K, Philip K.Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff?A Cross-country Investigation[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112(4):1251-1281. [4] 井世洁,杨宜音.转型期社会信任感的阶层与区域特征[J].社会科学,2013,(6):77-85. [5] (德)尼克拉斯·卢曼.信任:一个社会复杂性的简化机制[M].瞿铁鹏,李强译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.57-58. [6] 王绍光,刘欣.信任的基础:一种理性的解释[J].社会学研究,2002,(3):23-39. [7] (英)安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾译.南京:译林出版社,2011.115-118. [8] 周霞. 论农民工的社会网络与信任结构的同构性——以成都市大丰镇为例[J].西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(3):22-26. [9] 胡荣. 中国农村居民的社会信任[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2005,(2):46-51. [10] Yang,Y.Social Inequalities in Happiness in the United States,1972 to 2004:An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis[J].American Sociological Review,2008,73(2):204-226. [11] 孙立平. 现代化与社会转型[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.1-10. [12] 方文.转型心理学:以群体资格为中心[J].中国社会科学,2008,(4):137-147+207. [13] Inglehart R.Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press,1990.68. [14] Putnam R.Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital[J].Journal of Democracy,1995,6(1):65-78. [15] Robinson R V, Jackson E F.Is Trust in Others Declining in America? An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis[J].Social Science Research,2001,30(1):117-145. [16] Wilkes R.Re-thinking the Decline in Trust:A Comparison of Black and White Americans[J].Social Science Research, 2011,40(6):1596-1610. [17] Mayer K U.New Directions in Life Course Research[J].Annual Review of Sociology,2009,35(1):423-424. [18] Lehman R.Trust:A Sociological Theory by Piotr Sztompka[J].Contemporary Sociology,2001,30(4):418-420. [19] 周怡. 信任模式与市场经济秩序——制度主义的解释路径[J].社会科学,2013,(6):58-69. [20] 翟学伟. 社会流动与关系信任——也论关系强度与农民工的求职策略[J].社会学研究,2003,(1):1-11. [21] 胡荣,李静雅. 城市居民信任的构成及影响因素[J].社会,2006,(6):45-61+209-210. [22] 杨宜音.关系化还是类别化:中国人“我们”概念形成的社会心理机制探讨[J].中国社会科学,2008,(4):148-159+207-208. [23] 彭泗清. 信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999,(2):55-68. [24] Yang C F.Psychocultural Foundations of Informal Groups: The Issues of Loyalty,Sincerity,and Trust[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2000.85-106. [25] 杨国枢. 社会及行为科学研究的中国化[M].台北:中央研究院民族学研究所,1982.345-361. [26] Rempel J K, Holmes J G, Zanna M P.Trust in Close Relationships[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy,1985,49(1):95-112. [27] 杨中芳. 研究中国人性格的一个本土架构[J].中国社会心理学评论,2008,(1):223-251. [28] Ikeda K.Social and Institutional Trust in East and Southeast Asia[J].Taiwan Journal of Democracy,2013,9(1):13-46. [29] Ikeda K.Making Democracy Work via Functioning of Heterogeneous Personal Networks: Empirical Analyses Based on Japanese Election Study[C].International Social Capital Conference: Institutions.2004. [30] Uslaner E M. Inequality, Trust,Civic Engagement[J].American Politics Research,2005,33(6):868-894. [31] Putnam R.Bowling Alone:The Collapse and Revival of American Community[M].New York: Simon and Schuster,2000.251. [32] 李强,刘强.互联网与转型中国[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.84. [33] Rozin P,Royzman E B.Negativity Bias,Negativity Domin-ance,andContagion[J].Personality and Social Psychology Review,2001,5(4):296-320. [34] 赵晓航,李建新.当代青年的互联网使用与社会信任——基于CGSS2013数据的实证研究[J].青年研究,2017,(1):19-27+94. [35] 陈虹,秦静,李静,郑广嘉.互联网使用对中国城市居民人际交往的影响:社会认同的中介效应[J].新闻与传播研究,2016,(9):40-51+127. [36] 曾凡斌. 社会资本、媒介使用与城市居民的政治参与——基于2005中国综合社会调查(CGSS)的城市数据[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2014,(10):33-40. [37] 胡安宁, 周怡.再议儒家文化对一般信任的负效应——一项基于 2007 年中国居民调查数据的考察[J].社会学研究, 2013,(2):28-54. [38] Mood C.Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do,and What We Can Do About It[J].European Sociological Review,2010,26(1): 67-82. [39] 韩彦超. 市场化、社会网络与一般信任[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(2):127-135. [40] 周怡. 信任与公平:发展语境下的两个中国现实[J].江苏社会科学,2015,(3):87-96. [41] Morgner C,King M,Luhmann N.Trust and Power[M].Cambridge: Polity Press,2017.99. [42] Fukuyama F.Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity[M].New York: Free Press,1995.103.