Abstract：From Article 15 of The Civil Procedure Law to Article 11 of The Interpretation of Several Questions Concerning the Application of Law in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation and the scattered provisions of relevant documents, it can be seen that the supporting prosecution system in environmental civil public interest litigation has only a legal basis of framework, and general principles. This has led to the alienation of the system in practice, such as from supporting multiple prosecutors to a single prosecutor, from “not sending people to appear in court” to “sending people to appear in court”, from “supporting prosecution” to “participating in litigation”, from “supporting prosecution” in the first trial to “supporting prosecution” in the second trial. In the context of the continuous promotion of environmental civil public interest litigation, it is urgent to construct principles by clarifying the principles of “social participation”, “realistic necessity” and “limited involvement”. It is also necessary to improve the rules in the supporting prosecution system in environmental civil public interest litigation through building an integrated “supporting litigation” system, strengthening the institutional guarantee to support the “diversification” and “aggregation” of prosecutors, improving the substantive and procedural provisions supporting the initiation of prosecution and clearly defining the ways to support prosecution.
唐绍均, 王嘉琪. 环境民事公益诉讼中支持起诉制度的异化与匡正[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2020, 37(3): 100-110.
TANG Shao-jun, WANG Jia-qi. On Alienation and Rectification of Supporting Prosecution System in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation. , 2020, 37(3): 100-110.
2020, Vol. 37 
粤公网安备44030502007936号