Abstract：Rule of law in modern times is the rule of positive law, and constitution replaces the higher legal status of natural law, and is the core of the positive law system with characteristics of formal rationality. The positive law proposition of authoritative legislation rather than truth legislation means that the supervision of constitutional implementation by representative organs conforms to the inherent stipulation of people's sovereignty. The positive norm of constitutional supervision procedures integrates the value of rights law and the function of collaborative law, which can carry the constitutional supervision function of people’s representative organs. In terms of positive law logic, the constitutional supervision power is the power exclusive to sovereignty representatives and extension of constituent power. The National People’s Congress exercises constitutional supervision over the direct application of constitution by central state organs, local people’s congresses with legislative powers and people’s congresses of ethnic autonomous areas. The difference between constitutional supervision power and legislative power, as well as legitimacy of self-constitutional supervision, can be tackled by due process principle,namely, the constitutional review power and the legitimacy review power can be set apart through procedures setting. At the same time, more efforts should be put in value integration of constitutional supervision procedure than in legislative demonstration, so as to realize the procedure separation between constitutional review and legitimacy review and the construction of both.
汪栋. 宪法监督程序的实在法逻辑及其展开[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2019, 36(5): 87-100.
WANG Dong. Positive Law Logic of Constitutional Supervision Procedures and Its Deductions. , 2019, 36(5): 87-100.
2019, Vol. 36 
粤公网安备44030502007936号