Abstract：Due to the acceleration of modernity and the practical reason of “living well” and “doing well”, we cannot shy away from the“urban bioethics issue ”. How can a city take “good life” as its goal and “do a good job” in the settlement, coordination, satisfaction of needs and realizing meaning of individuals and the city as a whole? The complexity of modern big cities and their care for life are reflected in the bioethical challenges in the paradox of “understand—not understand” and “need—not need”. Whose life should the city care about and what kind of ethics should it abide by? This is a question-type expression of bioethics reflected in the slogan “city makes life better”. We need to respond to the question through understanding and interpretation of the life value of technology, culture, ecology, aesthetics, education, politics, economics, history, morality, and leisure life, think about the life dependency, ethical relation and the human and political connotation of bioethics between the big city and good life, define the tension between the center and periphery, life and death, form and content of the big city.
田海平. 美德之城的空间正义之维：从城市生命伦理及其“场域发生”看[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2019, 36(1): 5-13.
TIAN Hai-ping. Spatial Justice in the City of Virtue: from the Perspective of Urban Bioethics and its “Field Occurrence”. , 2019, 36(1): 5-13.
[1] (德)黑格尔.法哲学原理[M].范扬,张企泰译.北京:商务印书馆,1995. [2] (英)彼得霍尔.文明中的城市(第二册)[M].王志章等译.北京:商务印书馆,2016.783. [3] (美)卡斯腾·哈里斯.建筑的伦理功能[M].申嘉,陈朝晖译.北京:华夏出版社,2001. [4] Richard Sennett.The Fall of Public Man: On the Psychology of Capitalism[M].New York: Vintage Book, 1978.39. [5] (英)齐格蒙特·鲍曼.流动的现代性[M].欧阳景根译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.167.
2019, Vol. 36 
粤公网安备44030502007936号