Abstract：Due to the particularity of housing sources, possession, transfer and other aspects, sellers of farmers’ resettlement houses are inclined to use damages to the minors’ interests as “excuses” to break the contract and cause credibility crisis. In order to properly balance the interests of minors and the safety of transactions in the cases involving minors, it is necessary to solve the problems in the application of laws such as the effectiveness of sales contracts under different litigants and claims, the nature of disposition not for the interests of minor children, and the standards for subsequent damage compensation. Under the existing legal framework, in order to fill the legal loopholes in the disposal of minors’ property, it is necessary to appropriately introduce the theory of ostensible agency to provide legal basis for recognizing the external validity of parents’ disposition on behalf of their children, and on this basis reasonably determine the basis and standards for the establishment of the subsequent compensation litigation of minor children. In view of the loopholes in the provisions of China’s civil law on the disposal of minors’ property, it is better to avoid the differences and bias in judgment standard and establish a unified standard for the application of law by modifying the law to replace the subsequent benefit balance and relief after the event with the preset interest partition mechanism.
肖夏. 农居房交易中未成年人共有权益的保护与赔偿[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2018, 35(6): 101-110.
XIAO Xia. Protection and Compensation of Minors’ Rights in Transaction of Farmers’ Resettlement Houses. , 2018, 35(6): 101-110.
2018, Vol. 35 
粤公网安备44030502007936号