Analysis on the Development and Evolution of China’s Provincial Opening-up since the Reform and Opening to the Outside World
LU Zhi-guo1, PAN Feng2
1.College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060; 2.College of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030006
Abstract:Based on the economic data of Chinese provinces from 1978 to 2015, we measure and analyze the historical performance and evolution of the opening-up degree of Chinese provinces. At the same time, by constructing econometric models, we empirically test the influence of five factors on China's provincial openness, such as economic development level, transport infrastructure level, market scale, government intervention in market and factor endowment level. It is found that in the past forty years since reform and opening up, in the process of China’s opening up, mandatory institutional changes intersect with induced institutional changes, and the government and the market are well integrated. In this process, due to the cumulative effect, the forerunners still maintain their superior position. The law of diminishing marginal effect exists in the transportation infrastructure, which is an important means to promote regional coordination and opening up. The influence of labor factors on the openness is gradually replaced by human capital factors. The impact of economic base conditions on China's opening to the outside world is highly unstable due to the disturbance of the international situation. These conclusions provide significant policy implication for the overall design of China’s opening up mechanism in the new era.
鲁志国, 潘凤. 改革开放40年中国省域开放度的发展演进与成因分析[J]. 《深圳大学学报》(人文社科版), 2018, 35(1): 24-32.
LU Zhi-guo, PAN Feng. Analysis on the Development and Evolution of China’s Provincial Opening-up since the Reform and Opening to the Outside World. , 2018, 35(1): 24-32.
[1] 周茂荣,张子杰.对外开放度测度研究述评[J].国际贸易问题,2009,(8):121-128. [2] 蔡文浩,于倩,张赟.西部地区对外开放度的比较研究[J].经济问题参考,2012,(64):27-35. [3] Harrison A. Openness and growth: A time -series, cross-country analysis for developing countries[J].Journal of development Economics,1996,48(2):419-447. [4] Low p, Olarreaga M, Suarez J.Does globalization cause a higher concentration of international trade and investment flows?[M].World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Analysis Division,1998. [5] Stewart W. Institutional Quality and its Effect on trade: an empirical analysis[J].UBC Economic Honors Thesis,1999,(51):1183-1203. [6] 兰宜生.对外开放度与地区经济增长的实证分析[J].统计研究,2002,(2):19-22. [7] 陈升,潘虹.中国省域开放度的影响因素实证研究——基于1998-2012年省际面板数据的分析[J].经济问题因素,2010,(5):4-9. [8] H. Yanikkaya. Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation [J].Journal of Development economics,2003,72(1):57-89. [9] Chen B,Feng Y. Determinants of economic growth in china: Private enterprise, education and openness[J].China Economic Review,2000,11(1):1-15. [10] 魏浩,王宸.中国对外贸易空间集聚效应及其影响因素分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011,(11):66-82. [11] Ravn M O,Mazzenga E. International business cycles: the quantitative role of transportation costs[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2004,23(4):645-671. [12] Behrens K.International integration and regional inequalities: How important is national infrastructure?[J].Manchester school,2011,79(5):952-971. [13] 刘生龙,胡鞍钢.交通基础设施与中国区域经济一体化[J].经济研究,2011,(3):72-82. [14] Sachs J D, Warner A, Aslund A, et al. Economic reform and the process of global intergration[J].Brookings papers on economic activity,1995,(1):118. [15] Rodriguez F, Rodrik D. Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence[M].NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Volume 15.MIT press,2001.261-338. [16] Garrett G,Mitchell D.Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD[J].European Journal of Political Research,2001,39(2):145-177. [17] 易行健,左雅莉.外贸依存度的国际比较与决定因素分析——基于跨国面板数据的实证检验[J].国际经贸探索,2016,(9):25-39. [18] 申亮,董千里,李毅斌,刘睿君.交通基础设施门槛、对外开放与制造业生产效率[J].经济与管理,2015,(1):60 -65.