Abstract：The think tanks affiliated to Chinese universities have achieved great progress. In this process there arise problems of positioning controversy and vague problem awareness. The root of the problems is the traditional idea which contradicts scientific researches and policies and practices. To solve the problems, the central government has initiated some pilot programs of “China top think tanks”. We can analyze policymakers’ consideration and needs from a series of documents. Through separation of “social engineering” and “social science”, a set of topic selection framework of think tanks can demonstrate its unique problem awareness. Finally, the update idea of “unity of knowledge and action” of the think tanks can not only guide academic researches to hatch more feasible thoughts, but also overcome the “short-sightedness” of conventional countermeasure strategies. Future think tanks with Chinese characteristics affiliated to Chinese universities will surpass the think tanks in American party politics, and take more public obligations in the marketplace of ideas.
史晨. 从社会科学到社会工程：高校智库的定位策略、问题意识和未来走向[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2017, 34(5): 10-15.
SHI Chen. From Social Science to Social Engineering: Positioning, Problem Awareness, and Trend of Think Tanks in Universities. , 2017, 34(5): 10-15.
[1] McGann J G. 2016 Global Go to Think Tanks Index Report[R]. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania, 2017. [2] Hofstede G, Hofstede G J, Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.70. [3] 国家高端智库试点工作方案[Z].2016. [4] 国家高端智库管理办法（试行）[Z].2016. [5] 李成. 布鲁金斯学会今天如何思考[N]. 文汇报, 2015-03-13. [6] 中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2015.3-4. [7] Selee A. What Should Think Tanks Do: A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact[M]. Stanford University Press, 2013.11. [8] Nozick R. The Nature of Rationality[M]. Princeton University Press, 1994.164. [9] Grix J. The Foundations of Research[M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.34. [10] Popper K. The Open Society and its Enemies[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1971.148. [11] Donald K. Reinventing Government: A Fifth-Year Report Card[R]. Madison USA: Brookings Institution, 1998. [12] Kelman S. Unleashing Change: A Study of Organizational Renewal in Government[M]. Brookings Institution Press, 2005.84. [13] 马亮. 行为科学与循证治理:治国理政的创新之道[J]. 经济社会体制比较,2016,(6):11. [14] Singhal A, Sternin J, Dura L. Combating Malnutrition: Positive Deviance Grows Roots in Vietnam in the Land of a Thousand Rice Fields[R].2009. [15] Mackintosh U T, Marsh D R, Schroeder D G. Sustained Positive Deviant Child Care Practices and their Effects On Child Growth in Viet Nam[J]. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 2002,23(4 suppl2):18. [16] Heath C, Heath D. Switch: How to Change When Change is Hard[M]. New York: Random House, 2010.28. [17] 张康之,向玉琼.美国的智库建设与MPP教育[J].中国行政管理,2014,(9):109. [18] Medvetz T. Think Tanks in America[M].University of Chi-cago Press,2012.18. [19] Lipton E, Williams B. How Think Tanks Amplify Corporate Influence[N]. New York Times, 2016-08-07. [20] 刘元春.智库不能变成高校的会务中心[N].新华日报, 2017-02-09. [21] Carafano J J. Think Tanks Aren't Going Extinct. But They Have to Evolve. [N].The National Interest,2015-10-21. [22] 王阳明.传习录[M].钱明, 吴光编校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2012.12. [23] Bennett A.Are Think Tanks Obsolete?[N].Washington Post, 2015-10-05.
2017, Vol. 34 
粤公网安备44030502007936号