Abstract：James G. March and Johan P. Olsen have been emphasizing the function and value of institution in political studies. They point out that different interpretations of the basic concept of popular sovereignty can give rise to two different types of institution, namely, the aggregation type and the integration type. In their comparative study of the two types of institution, they also develop a theory concerning the appropriateness of institution. This article evaluates March and Olsen爷s theory and attempt to show its relevance to the ongoing democratic reformation in China.
刘晓靖. 恰适性制度理论述评：内涵与启示[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2015, 32(2): 97-101.
LIU Xiaojing. A Commentary on the Theory of Institutional Appropriateness: Its Significance and Revelation. , 2015, 32(2): 97-101.
2015, Vol. 32 
粤公网安备44030502007936号