全国统一大市场建设中的民营经济刑事司法平等保护：现状、机理与路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (522 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The construction of a unified national market requires criminal justice to provide equal protection to private economy, and substantial protection and social security for the new pattern of economic development. In terms of insufficient protection, there exist defects in charges, lack of qualitative basis, and unclear discretionary benchmark of statutory punishment. Given this situation, it is necessary to explore the mechanism of equal protection of criminal justice to private economy in the construction of a unified national market. The value of equal protection of criminal justice in private economy is to ensure free access of private enterprises to the market activities they are allowed entry. It is integrated with the value of justice to be the value of legal order, which is necessary in value construction. The value of equal protection of criminal justice lies in the three levels of freedom of legitimate operation, equal opportunity, and fair competition, which is taken as the basis for the criminalization of illegal acts involving the property rights of private enterprises. In terms of the transformation of the protection pattern of criminal justice, it is necessary to emphasize the protection of the legitimate freedom of the business owner, pay attention to the new management issues caused by the change of demand, and comprehensively examine the social damage of the crimes against the property rights of private sectors. To provide equal protection of criminal justice to private enterprises in the construction of a unified national market, it is necessary to clarify the legal interests of the crimes of negligence of duty, dereliction of duty, and breach of trust, to establish the criminalization basis for the illegal use of management right by senior executives of private enterprises, and to define the standard for the statutory punishment for similar crimes, in order to put the regulations into effect in the protection of private enterprises.

Key words： a unified national market private economy property rights of private enterprises equal protection of criminal justice legal interests

Received: 18 May 2022

PACS:

D924.3

Fund:2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“民营企业产权刑法平等保护问题研究”（20YJC820011）; 2020年度重庆理工大学科研启动基金项目“中国知识产权刑事保护问题研究”(2019ZD108)

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DOU Lu

Cite this article:

DOU Lu. Equal Protection of Criminal Justice to Private Economy in the Construction of a Unified National Market: Current Situation, Mechanism and Measures[J]. , 2022, 39(4): 115-124.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2022/V39/I4/115

[1] (德)施塔姆勒.正义法的理论[M].夏彦才译.北京:商务印书馆,2016.165.
[2] 张祥宇. 非公经济产权之刑法保护:缺陷与改进[J].法学论坛,2020,(2):153-160.
[3] 王志祥. 产权平等保护精神的贯彻与刑法修正——以《刑法修正案(十一)(草案)》的相关规定为基础的思考[J].法治研究,2020,(5):74-81.
[4] (美)胡萨克.过罪化及刑法的限制[M].姜敏译.北京:中国法制出版社,2015.248.
[5] Christine Hurt.The Duty to Manage Risk[J].Journal of Corporation Law,2014,39(2):253-294.
[6] 张明楷. 关于增设背信罪的探讨[J].中国法学,1997,(1):67-73.
[7] 张元珠. 渎职罪主体及依据冲突适用问题研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014,(2):38-44.
[8] 张军. 非公有制经济刑法规制与保护论纲[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2007.74.
[9] Velga Vevere,Inara Brante.Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption Risks of Enterprise Board Members[J],Balkan Social Science Review,2020,(15):219-236.
[10] S. Venugopal Rao.White Collar Crime[J].International Social Work,1978,21(3):50-60.
[11] 刘宪权. 《刑法修正案(十一)》中法定刑的调整与适用[J].比较法研究,2021,(2):122-134.
[12] 王钰. 功能刑法与责任原则围绕雅科布斯和罗克辛理论的展开[J].中外法学,2019,(4):1050-1074.
[13] L. T. Hobhouse.The Elements of Social Justice[M].New York: Henry Holt and Company,1922.106.
[14] Jesse Slankard.Moral Involuntariness and the Defence of Compulsion in New Zealand:A Review of Akulue v R[J].New Zealand Law Review,2015,(3):393-424.
[15] Anton-Hermann Chroust,David L Osborn.Aristotle’s Conception of Justice[J].Notre Dame Lawyer,1942,17(2):129-143.
[16] Anne Smith,Eithne McLaughlin.Delivering Equality:Equality Mainstreaming and Constitutionalisation of Socioeconomic Rights[J].Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly,2010,61(2):93-122.
[17] Edwin H.Sutherland.1949 White Collar Crime[M].New York:Dryden Re-Issued by Holt,1961.13.
[18] Geis Gilber,Ralph Nader,Mark J.Green.Deterring Corporate Crime[M].New York:Grossman,1973.182-197.
[19] Jack Katz.Legality and Equality:Plea Bargaining in the Prosecution of White-Collar and Common Crimes[J].Law & Society Review,1979,13(2):431-460.
[20] Thomas E.Davitt.Criminal Responsibility and Punishment[J],American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy,1960,(3):143-151.
[21] 卢建平. 完善金融刑法强化金融安全—《刑法修正案(十一)》金融犯罪相关规定评述[J].中国法律评论,2021,(1):34-42.
[22] 刘艳红. 刑法理论因应时代发展需处理好五种关系[J].东方法学,2020,(2):6-19.
[23] 刘艳红. 人性民法与物性刑法的融合发展[J].中国社会科学,2020,(4):114-137.
[24] (英)彼得·迪肯.全球性转变:重塑21世纪的全球经济地图[M].刘卫东等译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.398.
[25] 中共中央马恩列斯著作编译局.马克思恩格斯选集( 第23卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.106.
[26] Renato Machado de Souza.White-Collar Crime and Corruption:Liability of Legal Entities in the United States and Brazil[J].ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law,2019,26(1):29-100.