血统、族统、道统:司马迁中华民族共同体意识的一统建构

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (590 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract SIMA qian showed a magnificent boldness of “thoroughly understanding the changes from ancient times to modern times” in Shih Chi, especially when writing the Chinese national history. He comprehensively presented the authentic history of unified multi-nations from Yellow Emperor to Emperor Wu of Han, and built the Community of the Chinese Nation in the blood lineage, geographical relationship, nationality ideas and Confucian Orthodoxy. Shih Chi characterized Yellow Emperor as the common ancestor of the whole Chinese nations and cleared the descent between Five Emperors with the other nations, these made Chinese as a consanguinity community. Then, SIMA qian gave a clear idea of the world and took “Jiu Zhou” as the core of the China, which built the geographical community. Meanwhile, he weakened the difference between the Chinese and barbarians, advocated common development and prosperity for all nations in China. Finally, Shih Chi constructed the spirit community with the attitude of Confucian Orthodoxy and showed SIMA qian’s worship to Spring and Autumn in historical writing, which gave the common faith of morality and all-nations unified in Chinese national history. The contributions of the Shih Chi were great in national history, and the integral construction of the Chinese nation community was the consequence of SIMA qian’s historic ideas. Shih Chi has established the foundation and value orientation of the Chinese nation community, which has profound influence and epochal value.

Key words： SIMA qian Shih Chi the Chinese nation community blood lineage national unity Confucian Orthodoxy

Received: 05 January 2021

PACS:	I206
	I207

About author:: 国家社会科学基金一般项目“县域政治稳定与风险管控复合治理研究”（19BZZ065）

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LYU Xin-feng

Cite this article:

LYU Xin-feng. Blood Lineage, National Unity and Confucian Orthodoxy: the Unified Construction of Chinese Nation Community Ideas of SIMA qian[J]. , 2021, 38(5): 152-160.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I5/152

[1] (德)斐迪南·滕尼斯.共同体与社会[M].张巍卓译.北京:商务印书馆,2019.
[2] 司马迁. 史记[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[3] 林駧. 古今源流至论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992. 293.
[4] 李宗桂. 中国文化概论[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1988. 38.
[5] 徐中舒. 陈侯四器考释[A].徐中舒.历史论文选辑[C].北京:中华书局,1998.440.
[6] 于逢春. 华夷衍变与大一统思想框架的构筑——以《史记》有关记述为中心[J].中国边疆史地研究,2007,(2):21-34.
[7] 李景星. 史记评议[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
[8] 王明珂. 华夏边缘——历史记忆与族群认同[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2020.
[9] 钱大昕. 廿二史考异[M].方诗铭,周殿杰校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2004.1.
[10] 王恢. 史记本纪地理图考[M].台北:国立编译馆,1990.21.
[11] 田晓岫. 中华民族发展史[M].北京:华夏出版社,2001. 85.
[12] 郝敬. 尚书辨解[M].北京:中华书局,1991.33.
[13] 唐晓峰. 从混沌到秩序——中国上古地理思想史述论[M].北京:中华书局,2010.235.
[14] 吕不韦. 吕氏春秋[M].高诱注,毕沅校,徐小蛮标点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.399.
[15] 尔雅[M]雅[M].郭璞注,王世伟校点.上海:上海古籍出版社,2015.107.
[16] 刘向. 说苑今注今译[M].卢元骏注译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.612.
[17] 杜预. 春秋左传集解[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1977. 672.
[18] 班固. 汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.3755.
[19] 白寿彝.中国通史(第1卷)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1989.10.
[20] 汪高鑫. 司马迁与董仲舒夷夏观之比较[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(4):38-41.
[21] 徐复观. 两汉思想史(第三卷)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.207.
[22] 蔡靖泉. 舜歌《南风》与舜化南国[J].零陵师范高等专科学校学报,2001,(1):8-12.
[23] 陈直. 三辅黄图校证[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1985. 154.
[24] 章学诚. 文史通义[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2015.1.
[25] 钱杭. 《帝系》传说时代的世系观念及其表达方式[J].天津社会科学,2010,(2):129-134.
[26] 李霖. 从《五帝本纪》取裁看太史公之述作[J].文史哲,2020,(1):87-128.
[27] 司马光. 资治通鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1956.555.
[28] 严可均. 全汉文·卷四·泰山刻石文[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.45.
[29] 杜贵晨. 黄帝形象对中国“大一统”历史的贡献[J].文史哲,2019,(3):139-164.