|
|
|
| The Ontological Inquiry and Legal Strategy of Governance of Litigation Source |
| CAO Jian-jun |
| Law School of Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing, 100081 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract At the present stage, “governance of litigation source” has become a phenomenal political vocabulary and reform terminology. It can be combined with almost any specific type of case, regional development goals, and departmental landscape planning in the area of its connotation and extension. However, the interpretation given by the practical and theoretical circles presents the problems including expansion of situation, vague concepts, direction’s homogenization, and sloganizing reform. To promote the sustainable development and in-depth reform of governance of litigation source, the ontological essence and strategy of rule of law of China’s governance of litigation source should be clarified. In the judicial positioning,, the court shall play the role of a subsidiary rather than a leader, and “active integration” does not mean “active start”. In the governance content, the court should fully intervene in the municipal social governance and county-level grassroots governance in terms of spatial scope, governance level and governance dimension and so on. But it should be based on the determination of rights and obligations. In the governance mode, the governance of litigation source should focus on the “four requirements”, that is socialization, rule of law, intelligence and specialization. In the boundary delineation, it shall use systematic procedural rules to clarify the limit of judicial boundary of gridding, compulsory, and mobilization.
|
|
Received: 08 March 2021
|
|
|
| About author:: 天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“多数主体侵权纠纷的共同诉讼研究”(ZX20190116); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“普通共同诉讼制度的理论重构”(63202068) |
|
|
|
[1] 范跃红,龚婵婵.诉讼增量做减法办案质效做加法:浙江检察机关打好“组合拳”协调推进诉源治理[N].检察日报,2019-11-20(01).
[2] 郭彦.内外并举全面深入推进诉源治理[N].法制日报,2017-01-14(07).
[3] 中共大邑县委社治委.党建引领还权赋能打造社区“诉源治理”的新机制[J].国家治理,2019,(3):37-41.
[4] 北京市高级人民法院.创新工作机制推动“诉源治理”在北京落地见效[J]. 北京人大,2020,(1):41-43.
[5] 扬凡.搭建多方参与平台积极开展诉源治理[N].人民法院报,2019-08-29(02).
[6] 周苏湘. 法院诉源治理的异化——基于功能主义的研究视域[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,(1):28-37.
[7] 赵贵龙. “外嫁女”纠纷:面对治理难题的司法避让[J].法律适用,2020,(7):48-61.
[8] 陈发桂. 嵌入性治理:公众利益诉求理性表达的路径探析——以基层征地拆迁纠纷为视角[J].新疆社会科学,2011,(5):5-9.
[9] 鲁篱,凌潇.论法院的非司法化社会治理[J].现代法学,2014,(1):30-43.
[10] 徐汉明. 市域社会治理现代化:内在逻辑与推进路径[J].理论探索,2020,(1):13-22.
[11] 殷华.周强主持召开最高人民法院党组会议时强调:认真学习贯彻党的十九届五中全会精神为全面建设社会主义现代化国家提供有力司法服务和保障[EB/OL].https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2020/10/id/5553140.shtml,2020-11-15.
[12] 张甲天.把握精神实质忠诚履职担当推动党的十九届五中全会精神落实落地[EB/OL].https://www.chinacourt.org/index.php/article/detail/2020/11/id/5561384.shtml,2020- 11-15.
[13] 刘磊. 县域治理与基层法院的组织形态[J].环球法律评论,2019,(5):179-189.
[14] 魏培培. 司法建议制度的现状、定位与完善——以人民法院参与社会治理创新实践为视角[J].山东审判,2016,(4):55-59.
[15] 张文显. 新时代中国社会治理的理论、制度和实践创新[J].法商研究,2020,(2):3-17.
[16] 四川省成都市中级人民法院课题组.内外共治:成都法院推进“诉源治理”的新路径[J].法律适用,2019,(19):15-23.
[17] 龙飞. 论国家治理视角下我国多元化纠纷解决机制建设[J].法律适用,2015,(7):2-12.
[18] 陈洁,张帆.诉调对接中无争议事实效力审查规则构建[A].最高人民法院.司法体制综合配套改革与刑事审判问题研究——全国法院第30届学术讨论会获奖论文集(上)[C].最高人民法院:国家法官学院科研部,2019. 513-523.
[19] 卢海燕. 治理能力现代化视阈下民事纠纷解决智能化研究[J].广西社会科学,2020,(3):124-128.
[20] 胡晓霞. 我国在线纠纷解决机制发展的现实困境与未来出路[J].法学论坛,2017,(3):100-105.
[21] 陈俊伶,胡宇,吴莹.诉源治理实质化社会治理新格局[J].人民法治,2019,(11):91.
[22] 李勇.基层法院可借力网格化纠纷调处平台[N].江苏法制报,2012-05-08(C01).
[23] 吴青熹. 基层社会治理中的政社关系构建与演化逻辑——从网格化管理到网络化服务[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2018,(6):118-122.
[24] 刘小冰,肖盼.诉源治理“网格+”机制的若干思考[EB/OL].http://www.jsjc.gov.cn/qingfengyuan/202007/t202007 29_1065897.shtml,2020-08-26.
[25] 中国社会科学院法学研究所法治指数创新工程项目组.2019年中国法院信息化发展与2020年展望[A].中国法院信息化发展报告No.4(2020)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020.22-23.
[26] 安晨曦.司法文件:法律虚置后的裁判非正式规则——规则供给与文件政治的二重读解[J].湖北社会科学,2016,(9):156-157.
[27] 程熙. “运动式治理”日常化的困境——以 L 县基层纠纷化解活动为例[J].社会主义研究,2013,(4):111-115. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
