宪法监督程序的实在法逻辑及其展开

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (591 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Rule of law in modern times is the rule of positive law, and constitution replaces the higher legal status of natural law, and is the core of the positive law system with characteristics of formal rationality. The positive law proposition of authoritative legislation rather than truth legislation means that the supervision of constitutional implementation by representative organs conforms to the inherent stipulation of people's sovereignty. The positive norm of constitutional supervision procedures integrates the value of rights law and the function of collaborative law, which can carry the constitutional supervision function of people’s representative organs. In terms of positive law logic, the constitutional supervision power is the power exclusive to sovereignty representatives and extension of constituent power. The National People’s Congress exercises constitutional supervision over the direct application of constitution by central state organs, local people’s congresses with legislative powers and people’s congresses of ethnic autonomous areas. The difference between constitutional supervision power and legislative power, as well as legitimacy of self-constitutional supervision, can be tackled by due process principle,namely, the constitutional review power and the legitimacy review power can be set apart through procedures setting. At the same time, more efforts should be put in value integration of constitutional supervision procedure than in legislative demonstration, so as to realize the procedure separation between constitutional review and legitimacy review and the construction of both.

Key words： positive law NPC (National People’s Congress); constitutional supervision due process constitutional rights

Received: 01 July 2019

PACS:

D911

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Dong

Cite this article:

WANG Dong. Positive Law Logic of Constitutional Supervision Procedures and Its Deductions[J]. , 2019, 36(5): 87-100.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I5/87

[1] (德)马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.241.
[2] (法)爱弥尔·涂尔干.职业伦理与公民道德[M].渠东,付德根译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[3] (美)列奥·施特劳斯.霍布斯的政治哲学[M].申彤译.南京:译林出版社,2001.3.
[4] (美)爱德华·S·考文.美国宪法的“高级法”背景[M].强世功译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996.68.
[5] (美)列奥·施特劳斯.自然权利与历史[M].彭刚译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.
[6] 左传·文公十五年[A].十三经注疏传·文公十五年[A].十三经注疏[C].北京:中华书局,1980.1856.
[7] 冯友兰. 中国哲学史[M].北京:中华书局,2014.442.
[8] 李泽厚. 中国古代思想史论[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2017.
[9] (古希腊)柏拉图. 理想国[M].郭斌和,张竹明译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.279.
[10] (英)托马斯·霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼译.杨昌裕校. 北京:商务印书馆,1985.
[11] (美)昂格尔.现代社会中的法律[M].吴玉章,周汉华译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.189.
[12] 顾炎武. 顾亭林诗文集·郡县论一[M].北京:中华书局,1959.12.
[13] 王人博. 一个最低限度的法治概念——对中国法家思想的现代阐释[J].法学论坛,2003,(1):14.
[14] 商君书·赏刑第17[M].北京:中华书局,2009.138.
[15] 秦晖. “大共同体本位”与中国传统社会(上)[J].社会学研究,1998,(5):19.
[16] 严耕望. 中国地方行政制度史:秦汉地方行政制度[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2007.19.
[17] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.693.
[18] 李根蟠. 从秦汉家庭论及家庭结构的动态变化[J].中国史研究,2006,(1):6.
[19] 费孝通. 乡土中国·生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
[20] (法)埃米尔·涂尔干.社会分工论[M].渠东译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000.
[21] (法)勒内·达维.英国法与法国法:一种实质性比较[M].潘华仿等译.北京:清华大学出版社,2002.5.
[22] (德)马克斯·韦伯.论经济和社会中的法律[M].张乃根译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1998.62-63.
[23] 汪栋. 宪法程序考论[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.5.
[24] David Dyzenhaus.“Now the Machine Runs Itself”: Carl Schmitt on Hobbes and Kelsen[J].Cardozo Law Review,1994,16(1):6.
[25] 黄金荣. 法的形式理性论——以法之确定性问题为中心[J].比较法研究,2000,(3):290—291.
[26] 陈林林. 法治的三度:形式、实质与程序[J].法学研究,2012,(6):12.
[27] (英)戴雪. 英宪精义[M].雷宾南译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.116.
[28] John Watkins.Hobbes’s System of Ideas[M].London: Hutchinson University Library, 1973.114.
[29] 许崇德. 许崇德自选集[M].北京:学习出版社,2007. 203.
[30] (美)达尔.论民主[M].李柏光,林猛译.北京:商务印书馆,1999.32.
[31] (美)汉密尔顿,杰伊,麦迪逊.联邦党人文集[M].程逢如,在汉,舒逊译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.45.
[32] (美)列奥·施特劳斯,约瑟夫·克罗波西编. 政治哲学史(下)[M].李天然等译.石家庄:河北人民出版社,1993.766.
[33] (美)潘恩. 潘恩选集[M].马清槐等译.北京:商务印书馆,1981.146.
[34] 胡锦光. 立法法对我国违宪审查制度的发展及不足[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2000,(5):10.
[35] 翟小波. 论我国宪法的实施[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2009.
[36] 许崇德.论我国的宪法监督制度[J].法学,2009,(10).
[37] Kelsen.Pure theory of Law[M].Berkeley: University of California Press,1967.235.
[38] 范进学. 完善我国宪法监督制度之问题辨析[J].学习与探索,2015,(8):67—68.
[39] 韩大元. 《宪法解释程序法》的意义、思路与框架[J].浙江社会科学,2009,(9):19.
[40] 胡锦光. 论法规备案审查与合宪性审查的关系[J].华东政法大学学报,2018,(4):26.
[41] 莫纪宏. 论法律的合宪性审查机制[J].法学评论,2018,(6):29.
[42] John V.Orth.Due Process of Law: A Brief History[M]. Lawrence,Kansas: University Press of Kansas,2003.
[43] (英)约翰·洛克.政府论(下)[M].叶启芳,瞿菊农译.北京:商务印书馆,1964.89-90.
[44] 吴元元.信息能力与压力型立法[J].中国社会科学,2010,(1).
[45] (英)迈克尔·奥克肖特.《利维坦》导读[A].渠敬东主编.现代政治与自然[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.240.
[46] (英)迈克尔·奥克肖特. 政治中的理性主义[M].张汝伦译. 上海:上海译文出版社,2004.145.