|
|
|
| An Empirical Analysis on the Personal Attributes and Performance Behavior of NPC Deputie |
| LIU Le-ming |
| College of Political Science and Public Administration, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 201620 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There is an internal relationship between the individual attributes and performance behavior patterns of NPC deputies. Using the data of the professional background, education background and the nature of the proposal of the 11th NPC, through the analysis of cross list and scatter chart, it is found that 595 proposal deputies present three kinds of performance behavior patterns: Civil servants, Burkean trustees and Professionals. The interaction of professional background and educational background in the individual attribute influences the preference of the proposal in two aspects of Aims and Source of Judgment, and the latter two jointly shape the behavior mode of deputies. Direct elections are not the only way to establish a connection between deputies and voters. In the indirect election mode of the NPC, deputies to the NPC can establish a harmonious relationship and high-quality and efficient connection with the people through their own professional. More than 60% of the deputies of Civil servants and Burkean trustees are cadres within the system, they play a mainstay role in the Legislature. The proposals made by the deputies of entrepreneurs, professors, doctors, scientific and technological personnel and other professionals from the grass-roots are more grounded. From the perspective of improving performance and responsiveness, expanding the proportion of grassroots deputies is an optional way to optimize the structure of deputies to the People’s Congresses. The deputy’s performance of Civil servants is highly dependent, so it is of great significance to improve the performance of deputy’s performance by the construction of assistant organization.
|
|
Received: 16 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杜西川. 人大代表应代表谁的利益——行使权力的身份问题研究[J].法学杂志,1989,(1) :19-20.
[2] 柴清玉,张辉.如何理解人大代表的角色定位[N].人民代表报,2015-2-10(3).
[3] 苏东. 代表与“原”选举单位、“原”选区关系考辨[J].人大研究,2016,(2):9-41.
[4] 刘宝辉. 由西方“独立”与“委托”之争谈中国人大代表的逻辑[J].河北学刊,2016,(2):199-203
[5] 蔡定剑. 中国人大制度[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1992.157-159.
[6] 温辉. 代表与选民的关系[J].现代法学,2001,(2):87-92.
[7] 孙莹. 论我国人大代表结构比例的调整优化——以精英主义和多元主义代表模式为分析框架[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(4):163-173.
[8] Melanie Manion.Authoritarian Parochialism: Local Congressional Representation in China[J].The China Quarterly,2014,218:311-338.
[9] Kevin J,O’Brien. Agents and Remonstrators: Role Accumulation by Chinese People’s Congress Deputies[J]. The China Quarterly, 1994,138:359-380.
[10] 邹平学. 关于人大代表行使权力的身份的理论与实践[J].中国法学,1994,(6):37-42.
[11] 邱家军. 代表谁?——选民与代表[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2010.309-331.
[12] 桑玉成,邱家军.从代表议案和建议看代表属性及其履职之效率——以十一届全国人大二次会议为例[J].江苏行政学院学报,2010,(1):76-83.
[13] 何俊志,王维国.代表结构与履职绩效——对北京市13个区县的乡镇人大之模糊集分析[J].南京社会科学,2012,(1):78-83.
[14] 何俊志,刘乐明.全国人大代表的个体属性与履职状况关系研究[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2013,(2):113-121.
[15] 黄冬娅,陈川慜.县级人大代表履职:谁更积极?[J].社会学研究,2015,(4):169-193.
[16] 陈斌. 县级人大代表身份属性与履职状况研究——以510件县级人大代表的议案、建议为例[J].人大研究,2015,(3):16-22.
[17] (加)弗兰克·坎宁安.民主理论导论[M].谈火生,年玥,王民靖译.吉林:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2010.12.
[18] (美)汉娜·皮特金.代表的概念[M].唐海华译.吉林:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2014.177.
[19] Andrew Rehfeld.Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy[J]. American Political Science Review, 2009,103(2):214-230.
[20] Rory Truex.Representation by Design: Preference Congruence in Authoritarian Parliament[R].Working Paper, 2012.2-4.
[21] Cho Young Nam.Local People’s Congresses in China: Development and Transition[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,2008.83-112.
[22] 王绍光. 代表型民主与代议型民主[J].开放时代,2014,(2):152-174.
[23] 王晨. 坚持和完善人民代表大会制度这一根本政治制度[A].《中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定》辅导读本[C].北京:人民出版社,2019.31-32. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
