“一带一路”：内在逻辑、全球定位和学理支撑

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (13)

Download: PDF (794 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The construction and cooperation of the “Belt and Road” is a new starting point for China's reform and opening up, and it is also a new opportunity for China to connect with the world. The Belt and Road Initiative is in line with the inherent logic of historical development and realistic needs. It is a global-oriented Chinese program that embraces the world in an open manner, and is an international cooperation platform connecting the “Chinese Dream” and the “World Dream”. It is an important endeavor to build a community of a shared future for mankind. Looking back on history, we can see the concept of Belt and Road Initiative is in line with the origin of Marxism. It is born out of the Marxist world history theory, contains the latest development of Marxism in the new era, and is a breakthrough in the theory of economic development, geopolitical theory and geo-economic theory. At the same time, the construction and cooperation of the “Belt and Road” is connected with the world both in hardware (such as infrastructure construction) and software (such as relevant policy support systems). The construction and cooperation of the “Belt and Road” is a great project to build a new international economic order and a community of a shared future for mankind. It helps promote world peace, prosperity and development.

Key words： Belt and Road Initiative inherent logic global orientation theoretic basis a community of a shared future for mankind

Received: 21 April 2019

PACS:

F120

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIANG Hao-guang

Cite this article:

LIANG Hao-guang. Inherent Logic, Global Orientation and Theoretic Basis of the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. , 2019, 36(4): 80-89.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I4/80

[1] 王义桅. “一带一路”彰显改革开放的世界意义[J].太平洋学报,2018,26(9).
[2] 王庆五. 中国道路、中国模式与中国经验[J].江苏行政学院学报,2009,(3):5-12.
[3] 赵长峰. 改革开放以来中国与世界关系的变化[J].社会主义研究,2008,(5):95-99.
[4] 刘卫民. 中国模式研究[M].北京:人民日报出版社,2012.
[5] 邹东涛,欧阳日辉.中国道路与中国模式(1949~2009)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.1.
[6] 郑永年.中国模式:经验与挑战[M].北京:中信出版社, 2016.1.
[7] 郑永年. 中国模式的核心是什么?[J].社会观察,2010,(12):87-88.
[8] 丁学良. 辩论“中国模式”[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.10-11.
[9] 周文,包炜杰.中国方案:一种对新自由主义理论的当代回应[J].经济社会体制比较, 2017,(3):1-9.
[10] 门洪华. 促成中国与世界的良性互动:中国理想、中国智慧与中国方案[J].当代世界,2017,(10):14-17.
[11] 王义桅. “一带一路”2.0引领新型全球化[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(4):387-395.
[12] 李明伟. 丝绸之路研究百年历史回顾[J].西北民族研究,2005,(2):90-106.
[13] 孙占鳌. 丝绸之路的历史演变[J].发展,2014,(6):39-40.
[14] 张德荣. “中等收入陷阱”发生机理与中国经济增长的阶段性动力[J].经济研究,2013,48(9):17-29.
[15] 姜丽,金鑫.“一带一路”的国际担当和时代价值[J].红旗文稿,2018,(14).
[16] 阎沭杉,高晨宇.推动“一带一路”建设应对“逆全球化”风潮[J].现代管理科学,2018,(6):21-23.
[17] 吴志成,吴宇.人类命运共同体思想论析[J].世界经济与政治,2018,(3).
[18] 高石磊. 马克思共同体思想意蕴研究[J].求实,2015,(6):4-10.
[19] 马克思恩格斯全集(第12卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 1962.71.
[20] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995. 755.
[21] 曹绿.以马克思世界历史理论审视人类命运共同体[J]. 思想理论教育,2017,(3).
[22] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社, 2009.541.
[23] 马俊峰. 马克思世界历史理论的方法论意义[J].中国社会科学,2013,(6):4-20.
[24] 王跃生, 吕磊.“一带一路”建设、全球结构重建与世界经济增长新引擎[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2016,(4).
[25] 袁伟华. 时间与空间:新型国际关系中的时空观[J].世界经济与政治,2016,(3):26-43.
[26] 光明网.“一带一路”需要“原理论”[EB/OL].http://www.gm w.cn/xueshu/2018-12/05/content_32109505.htm.2018- 12-20.
[27] 贾秀东. 让世界共享“新时代”[J].决策探索(下半月), 2017,(10):1.
[28] 习近平.共担时代责任共促全球发展[N].人民日报海外版,2017-01-18.
[29] 孙祁祥,锁凌燕, 郑伟.“一带一路”与新型全球化:风险及应对[J].中共中央党校学报,2017,21(6):100-106.
[30] 王义桅. 超越和平崛起——中国实施包容性崛起战略的必要性与可能性[J].世界经济与政治,2011,(8):140-154.
[31] 中国一带一路网. 数据观丨“一带一路”这五年:舆论态度转变,网民充满期待[EB/OL]. https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/ghsl/slsg/66757.htm.2019-03-10.