|
|
|
| Spatial Reconstruction and Governance Reform of Transitional Community: A Comparative Study on Three Patterns of Spatial Reconstruction in Shenzhen |
| WU Dan |
| Department of Public Administration, Shenzhen University of Administration, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518034 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an important perspective on community governance research, space is the dynamics of transitional community’s development and explains the dilemma of its governance. With China’s urbanization, spatial reconstruction of transitional community comes to be a core variable of its governance structure, governance resources and public interests. Transitional community’s spatial reconstruction in Shenzhen has three patterns including urban renewal, integrated renovation and community planning, with different influence and efficacy on community governance: urban renewal uses market mechanism to expand resources of community governance and improve public environment but to increase social exclusion of low-income group and negative externalities of the city’s development; integrated renovation uses the resources of government and market to improve public environment and relieve the severe impact on survival space of immigrants, but it’s lack of public participation; Compared with the former two, community planning pays more attention to public participation and protection for multiple groups’interests but it’s difficult to implement due to the lack of institutional support. Therefore, with reflection on the practice of transitional community’s spatial reconstruction, we should build a sound spatial institution in accordance with transitional community’s governance, execute comprehensive strategies on its governance and develop a fair public policy oriented by good governance.
|
|
Received: 16 October 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 城中村治理,要旧改更要综治[N].南方日报(SC03),2017- 08-31.
[2] 孙宝强.社区股份合作公司需以改革激发活力[N].深圳特区报(C2),2016-12-20.
[3] 蓝宇蕴.转制社区:“三重结构”及治理之困[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2017,(5).
[4] 蓝宇蕴.转型社区的“总体性”组织及其破解[J].学术研究,2016,(11).
[5] 蓝宇蕴.非农集体经济及其“社会性”建构[J].中国社会科学,2017,(8).
[6] 蒋慧,吴新星.“过渡型社区”治理问题的政治社会学解析——基于社会资本的视角[J].大连理工大学学报,2012,(3).
[7] [美]马克·戈特迪纳,雷·哈奇森.新城市社会学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2011.
[8] 方亚琴,夏建中.社区、居住空间与社会资本——社会空间视角下对社区社会资本的考察[J].学习与实践,2014,(11).
[9] 舒小虎.社区公地及其治理[J].社会主义研究. 2017,(1).
[10] 袁方成,汪婷婷.空间正义视角下的社区治理[J].探索,2017,(1).
[11] 张勇.何艳玲.论城市社区治理的空间面向[J].新视野,2017,(4).
[12] 蓝宇蕴.城中村空间结构的社会因素分析[J].学术研究,2008,(3).
[13] 马学广.城中村空间的社会生产与治理机制研究——以广州市海珠区为例[J].城市发展研究,2010,(2).
[14] 蔡禾,卢俊秀.制度变迁背景下的社区权力与秩序——基于广州市一个城中村的研究[J].广东社会科学,2007,(9).
[15] 周庆智.论中国社区治理——从威权式治理到参与式治理的转型[J].学习与探索,2016,(6).
[16] 吴丹.城市更新的空间生产——基于深圳实践的反思[J].广东行政学院学报,2017,(4).
[17] 市政府常务会议原则通过城市环境品质提升系列行动计划——破解管理治理难题提升城市环境品质[N].深圳特区报,2017-11-09(A04).
[18] 赵蔚.社区规划的制度基础及社区规划师角色探讨[J].规划师,2013,(9).
[19] 吴丹,王卫城.深圳社区规划师制度的模式研究[J].规划师,2013,(9).
[20] 南京市委党校课题组.社区治理能力现代化指标体系研究——基于南京的调查[J].南京市委党校学报,2016,(6). |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
