|
|
Existence logic, Identification Difficulty and Confirmation Basis of Legislative Inaction |
DAI Shui-ping |
Law school of Northwestern University, Xian, Shaanxi, 710127 |
|
|
Abstract Legislative inaction is widespread in the legal governance of all countries. Different countries have different judicial precedents for legislative inaction and relevant theories and books are divided on this issue. Up to now, people do not agree on many aspects such as the existence and identification basis of legislative inaction. Based on the existence of legislative discretion, safeguard of vested interest by different interest groups, dilemma of collective action in legislation, the government's preference of efficiency for “ways beyond rule of law”, and inadequate legislative ability, the logic of legislative inaction is indisputable. However, its identification is indeed difficult because it is hard to define the boundary of legislative responsibility, to judge whether legislative conditions are mature, to determine legislative slack behavior and to specify its adverse consequences. Legislative departments take charge of legislation. Objectively speaking, condition of legislation is mature and they have capability of legislation. Legislative inaction denies civil rights as an indispensable basis for its identification. It can be identified through legislative evaluation and other methods in individual cases.
|
Received: 20 March 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 伏创宇. 行政立法不作为构成要件论[J].江汉大学学报( 社会科学版),2013,(4):36. [2] 赵立新. 日本的“立法不作为”与违宪审查[A].法律文化研究:第三辑[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.170. [3] 许宗力. 宪法与法治国行政[M].台北:元照出版公司,2007.521. [4] 杨福忠. 立法不作为侵权赔偿:国家赔偿责任形式的新发展[J].政治与法律,2008,(9):56. [5] 唐卫彬,刘亢.“诸侯经济”阻碍长江产业链自然延伸[N].经济参考报,2014-12-1(A05). [6] R.Kent Weaver.The Politics of Blame Avoidance[J].Journal of Public Policy ,1986,(6):371-398. [7] [法]莱昂·狄骥.公法的变迁[M].郑戈,冷静译.沈阳:辽海出版社、春风文艺出版社,1999.183. |
|
|
|