|
|
|
| 2017 Annual Report on China’s Philosophy Studies |
| KANG Yu |
| College of Government, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150080 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the year 2017, China’s philosophy studies again tried to "trace back to the origin and be creative" and construct meaning, focusing on such themes as cultural confidence and tradition revival. In classic development and interpretation, researchers tried to seek breakthrough from details, emphasized objectivity and history of literature interpretation, and integrated interpretation and construction. When exploring and interpreting philosophies of great figures, researchers tried to make comprehensive studies, focusing on “looking for supplementary materials” and the development of “heretic” and “unpopular” thoughts. The clarification and development of concept categories are much closer to real life. With strong “root consciousness”, academics stick to the rationality of traditional concept categories. Their category interpretation is often linked to “metaphysics” construction, and they do not forget the thinking tradition of “intuitive comprehension”. The methodological construction reflection is based on both epistemology and humanism, emphasizing the overall concept and also taking dialectical logic analysis into account. In their studies, academics face up to problems, and highlight discussions of political philosophy. They are more “inclusive” than “critical”, and advocate more “improvements” than “reforms”. It can be expected that the future development of Chinese philosophy will attach more importance to the connection with the classics, balance between China and West, global perspective and personal style of academics.
|
|
Received: 03 January 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 丁四新.楚竹书《恒先》的三重宇宙生成论与气论思想[J].哲学动态,2017,(9):31.
[2] 冯时.四诗考[J].复旦学报,2017(3):46.
[3] 杨庆中.《易传》对八卦符号系统的哲学解读[J].哲学研究,2017(3):41.
[4] 李振纲.以“变”应“时”,“变”中求“通”——从“变”看《易传》哲学的人文特质[J].哲学研究,2017(6):32.
[5] 景海峰.中国经典诠释学建构的三个维度[J].天津社会科学,2017(1):52.
[6] 朱汉民.儒学与“六经”的文化同源与相互生成[J].天津社会科学,2017(1):154.
[7] 江林昌.民族“典”“册”的形成与儒家“述而不作”的意义[J].孔子研究,2017(1):21.
[8] 黄开国,黄子鉴.“经学是研究儒家经典的学说”质疑[J].哲学研究,2017(2):27.
[9] 周炽成.从先荀后孟之说看汉唐荀孟关系以及荀子在儒学中的地位[J].社会科学,2017(5):105.
[10] 潘小慧.荀学视域中的“天下”和“国（家）”[J].中国人民大学学报,2017(3):16.
[11] 杨国荣.王阳明心学的多重向度[J].贵阳学院学报,2017(4):7.
[12] 罗传芳.老子哲学的生存论特征及与儒家的分判[J].哲学研究,2017(1):45.
[13] 杜保瑞.汤一介哲学概念范畴进路的方法论反思[J].深圳大学学报,2017(3):68.
[14] 唐文明.朱子《仁说》中的义理与工夫[J].北京大学学报,2017(3):54.
[15] 向世陵.张栻的仁说及仁与爱之辨[J].学术月刊,2017(6):42.
[16] 王正.重思先秦儒家的仁义内外之辨[J].哲学动态,2017(1):79.
[17] 蔡振丰.中国哲学中的体用义[J].杭州师范大学学报,2017(9):37-42.
[18] 张晓芒,郎需瑞.传统名辩的视域分殊及方法论反思[J].南开学报,2017(2):89.
[19] 乐爱国.朱熹的“理先气后”：一种心性工夫论的论证[J].人文杂志,2017(4):22.
[20] 杜运辉.马克思主义视阈下的大陆新儒学[J].马克思主义研究,2017(5):144.
[21] 潘德荣.“德行”与诠释[J].中国社会科学,2017(6):23.
[22] 郭齐勇.中国哲学的丰富内涵与独特优势[J].人民论坛,2017(8):39.
[23] 张汝伦.中国哲学与当代世界[J].哲学研究,2017(1):91.
[24] 陈少明.做有说服力的儒学[J].孔子研究,2017(1):13-15. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 35 
