|
|
|
| The “Appropriateness” Logic of the Institutional Choice in the Practice of Grassroots Social Governance |
| LIU Zhen, XU Li-juan |
| Social and Public Administration School,East China University of Science and Technolog,Shanghai 200237 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract For the relationship between formal system and informal system in grassroots social governance, there are three representative views of “complementary theory”, “substitution theory”and“conflict theory”in the current discussion. But these are mostly based on static perspective analysis and ignoring the micro-governance “field”problem. And it is difficult to explain the phenomenon of institutional change. This article discusses the process of changing the C property management system. It is a process from the formal system failure to the informal system, and then to the informal system of “negative external” led to the formal system return, and shows a formal system and informal system “cyclical change” course. It can be seen that the relationship between the formal system and the informal system is not a static structure, but a dynamic process in which the institutional arrangements are constantly changing with the changing social scene. And the mechanism that makes this change lies in the “appropriateness” of institutional arrangements for governance. Based on this, the article explores the “appropriateness logic” of the system selection from the perspective of the relationship between the actors in the governance field, and deconstructs it into three characteristics, Which is the organic unity of the logic of the main body of governance, the rational application of the structure of the community residents, the organizational identity of the community resident. In this paper, we can provide some reference and reference for practical application.
|
|
Received: 15 June 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李慧凤.制度结构、行为主体与基层政府治理[J].南京社会科学,2014,（2）.
[2] 崔万田,周晔馨.正式制度与非正式制度的关系探析[J].教学与研究,2006,（8）.
[3] 杨嵘均.论正式制度与非正式制度在乡村治理中的互动关系[J].江海学刊,2014,（1）.
[4] 唐绍新.传统、习俗与非正式制度安排[J].江苏社会科学,2003,（5）.
[5] 温莹莹.非正式制度与村庄公共物品供给——T村个案研究[J].社会学研究,2013,（1）.
[6] 章荣君.乡村治理中正式制度与非正式制度的关系解析[J].行政论坛,2015,（3）.
[7] 高满良.农村治理中的非正式制度分析——对砚山县鲁都克村的个案研究[J].云南行政学院学报,2013,（2）.
[8] 彭玉生.当正式制度与非正式规范发生冲突：计划生育与宗族网络[J].社会,2009,（1）.
[9] 刘晓靖.恰适性制度理论述评：内涵与启示[J].深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2015,（2）.
[10] [美]詹姆斯·G·马奇,[挪]约翰·P·奥尔森.重新发现制度：政治的组织基础[M].张伟译.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,2011.
[11] [美]彼得·豪尔,[美]罗斯玛丽·泰勒.政治科学与三个制度主义[J].何俊智译.经济社会体制比较,2003,（5）.
[12] 秦国民,高亚林.恰适性：推进国家治理现代化的制度建设原则[J].中国行政管理,2015,（9）.
[13] 孙立平.断裂：20世纪90年代以来的中国社会[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2003.113.
[14] [美]道格拉斯·C.诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].刘守英译.上海：上海三联书店,1994. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 34 
