老龄化之因应与长期照护保险法制之展望

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (544 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Due to large population basis, population ageing is a large-scale and very quick process for China. The increasing number of old disabled people demands dedicated care. For a long time, China has been turning over this responsibility to families, and the families cover the care fee and provide care takers. However, with the dramatic changes in family structures due to the imbalance of age structure and the progressively diminishing family size from one generation to the next caused by family planning policies, how to take care of the elderly disabled parents from both sides after the only children getting married, how to regulate overcharging care services and services of different types and qualities, and how to respond when families cannot afford to take care of their elders has become social concerns. Social concerns need to be regulated with social laws. Care risk, a type of survival risks, has become social risk. Long-term care insurance, a social insurance formed and used in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, has adequate experience to address the issue. At present, China has launched pilot programs in long-term care insurance system. We have reason to believe that long-term care insurance system will soon be put on the agenda of lawmakers and eventually come into shape. However, only following the path of this unique system in legal principles, security objectives, legal provision accuracy, and experience accumulation can we help rule the country by law in the field of social insurance.

Key words： population ageing long-term care care risk rule the country by law

Received: 20 February 2017

C913.6

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHENG Shang-yuan
	YUAN Shao-jie

Cite this article:

ZHENG Shang-yuan,YUAN Shao-jie. Responses to Population Ageing and Prospects for Long-term Care Insurance Legislation[J]. , 2017, 34(3): 127-134.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2017/V34/I3/127

[1] 国家统计局.2015年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[ED/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201602/t20160229_1323 991.html.2017-01-01.
[2] 联合国老龄化议题、老龄问题领域的重大发展[ED/OL].联合国官方网站.http://www.un.org/chinese/esa/ageing/facts1.htm.2016-12-19.
[3] 钟秉正.我国长期照护制度亟待立法管理[J].消费者报导,1999,（353）：36-39.
[4] Pedro Olivares-Tirado, Nanako Tamiya.Trends and Factors in Japan's Long-Term Care Insurance System:Japan's 10-year Experience[M].Book Springer：Briefs in Aging,2014.4-9.
[5] 王梦婕,张昢昢.失独家庭生存状况调查——我们的晚年何处安放[N].中国青年报,2013-01-22（03）.
[6] 陈磊.老龄法律法规薄弱难助养老服务发展[N].法制日报, 2017-01-06（05）.
[7] 罗娟.15个城市试点长期护理保险制度[N].工人日报,2016-07-19（06）.
[8] 陆敏清.日本照护保险法之研究[D].台湾：国立中正大学法律研究所硕士论文,2002.
[9] 谢荣堂.社会法治国之社会安全法制[J].月旦法学教室,2003,（10）：125-126.
[10] 福武直.社会保障与社会保障论[A].社会保障研究所编,社会保障的基本问题[C].东京：东京大学出版社,1983.15.
[11] 高腾昭.社会保障法的基本原理与构造[M].东京：日本法政大学出版局,1994.27-30.
[12] 台湾社会法与社会政策学会主编.社会法[M].台北：元照出版有限公司,2015.25.
[13] 郑尚元.劳动法与社会保障法前沿问题[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2011.151.
[14] Patrick Hennessy.The Growing Risk of Dependency in Old Age:What Role for Families and for Social Security[J].International Social Security Review,1997,（50）：23-25.
[15] 钟秉正.德国长期照护法制之经验[J].长期照护杂志,2010,（2）:121.
[16] 增田雅畅.介护保险法（新版）[M].日本：有斐阁,2000.3-5.
[17] 吴淑琼.人口老化与长期照护政策[J].国家政策季刊,2005,（4）：7-21.
[18] 菊池馨実.社会保障法[M].日本：有斐阁,2014.16-17.
[19] 林美色.长期照护保险：德国荷兰模式析论[M].台北：巨流图书公司,2011.255-257.
[20] 奚冬琪.“长期护理险”期待完善配套政策[N].人民政协报,2016-12-26（05）.
[21] 郑尚元,李海明.社会保险法制之开启——评“中华人民共和国社会保险法”[J].月旦民商法,2011,（34）：99-116.