|
|
|
| Expose and Aletheuein：QIAN Zhong-shu’s View of the Speech Pattern of Mysticism |
| LIU Tao |
| School of Arts, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Trough the interpretation of Laotse’s mysticism, QIAN Zhong-shu makes in-depth analysis of the speech pattern of mysticism. After interpreting the first chapter of Laotse, QIAN puts forward the thesis that it is the non-speakable nature of Tao(道) that allows for various interpretation of Tao. On this basis, QIAN sharply criticizes the radical proposal of mysticism that saints should keep sagely silence, and believes the proposal contains insurmountable internal contradictions. QIAN points out that mysticism, by using dialectical method such as Laotse’s belief of “Tao is perpetual motion of contradiction”, has its own way of expression: using words to invalidate words or validating what it means by saying less and even the opposite. QIAN’s analysis of the speech pattern of mysticism is closely related to his exposition of related literary issues.
|
|
Received: 11 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 敏泽.钱钟书先生谈“意象”[J].文学遗产,2000,（2）：5.
[2] 钱钟书.谈艺录[M].北京：三联书店,2007.
[3] 钱钟书.管锥编[M].北京：三联书店,2007.
[4] 黎兰.钱钟书的述学文体[M].太原：三晋出版社,2015.31.
[5] 邬昆如.庄子与古希腊哲学中的道[M].台北：国立编译馆,1972.182.
[6] Gershon Weiler.Mauthner’s Critique of Language[M].Camb-ridge:Cambridge University Press,1970.292.
[7] [宋]普济.五灯会元[M].北京：中华书局,1984.202.
[8] [宋]程颐,程颢.二程集[M].北京：中华书局,1981.351.
[9] [金]王若虚.滹南遗老集校注[M].胡传志,李定乾校注.沈阳：辽海出版社,2006.33.
[10] 刘阳.以言去言：钱钟书文论形态的范式奥蕴[J].文艺理论研究,2004（5）：20. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 34 
