从“夫妇有别”到“夫妇相和”：近代日本两性关系的形塑

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (609 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The Imperial Rescript on Education promulgated by the Meiji Government in 1890 is a significant document in the spiritual history of modern Japan. On gender issues, The Imperial Rescript on Education redefined men-women relationship, replacing the traditional Confucian notion of “husbands and wives being different” with a new idea of “husbands and wives being harmonious”. Besides, many intellectual elites interpreted the idea of “husbands and wives being harmonious” from different perspectives and cast new light on this newly defined relationship. The evolution from ‘being different” to “being harmonious” is more a representation of male elites’ dominance of literal interpretation with which they shaped men-women relationship and the ideal women than an epitome of men-women relationship and women issues in modern Japan.

Key words： husbands and wives being different husbands and wives being harmonious The Imperial Rescript on Education Inoue Tetsujiro

Received: 08 October 2016

K313.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Xiao-xia

Cite this article:

ZHOU Xiao-xia. Shaping Men-women Relationship in Modern Japan: from “Being Different” to “Being Harmonious”[J]. , 2017, 34(1): 22-29.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2017/V34/I1/22

[1] 司马迁.史记（卷49）[M].北京：中华书局,1999.1579.
[2] 程颐.伊川易传（卷3）[Z].钦定四库全书,1.
[3] 刘文刚.孟子“夫妇有别”论小议——兼与金景芳先生商榷[J].历史研究,2000,（3）.
[4] 杨天宇.礼记译注[M].上海：上海古籍出版社,2004.
[5] 朱杰人等主编.朱子全书（24）[M].上海：上海古籍出版社,2002.408.
[6] （日）井上哲次郎,蟹江義共編.日本倫理叢編（巻之1）[M].東京：育成会,1903.
[7] （日）関口すみ子.「夫婦有別」から「夫婦相和シ」へ——「男は外を務め女は内を治む」の行方[J].女性史学,2003,（13）.
[8] （日）同文館編輯局編.日本教育文庫（訓誡篇上）[M].東京：同文館,1910.580.
[9] （日）松平定信.楽翁公遺書（上巻）[M].東京：八尾書店,1893.35~36.
[10] （日）山鹿素行.山鹿語類（第2巻·19）[M].東京：国書刊行会,1911.275.
[11] （日）渡辺浩.『夫婦有別』と『夫婦相和』[J].中国——社会と文化,2000,（15）：208~214.
[12] （日）山室信一,中野目徹校注.明六雑誌（中）[M].東京：岩波書店,2008.
[13] （日）西澤直子編.福澤諭吉著作集（第10巻）[M].東京：慶應義塾大学出版会,2003.124.
[14] （日）日本弘道会編.西村茂樹全集（第12巻）[M].京都：思文閣出版,2013.436~437.
[15] （日）日本弘道会編.西村茂樹全集（第2巻）[M].京都：思文閣出版,2004.411.
[16] （日）海後宗臣.教育勅語成立史の研究[M].東京：厚徳社,1965.
[17] （日）国民精神文化研究所.教育勅語渙発関係資料集（第一巻）[M].東京：国民精神文化研究所,1938.59.
[18] （日）吉田熊次.教育勅語釈義[M].東京：弘道館,1930.101.
[19] （日）山田孝雄.教育に関する勅語義解[M].東京：宝文館,1934.39.
[20] （日）文部省編.国体の本義[M].文部省,1937.
[21] （日）島薗進,磯前順一編.井上哲次郎集（第8巻）[M].東京：クレス出版,2003.31.
[22] 刘岳兵.日本近现代思想史[M].北京：世界知识出版社,2010.110.
[23] （日）国民精神文化研究所.教育勅語渙発関係資料集（第三巻）[M].東京：国民精神文化研究所,1940.
[24] （日）井上哲次郎,高山林次郎.倫理教科書総説[M].東京：金港堂,1898.56.
[25] （日）稲田正次.教育勅語成立過程の研究[M].東京：講談社,1971.354~356.
[26] Johann KasparBluntschli.政治学（第八編）[M].中根重一訳译.東京：近藤幸正出版,1882~1883.23~33.
[27] （日）井上哲次郎.女子修身教科書（巻1）[M].東京：金港堂,1903.10.
[28] （日）井上哲次郎.女子修身教科書（巻4）[M].東京：金港堂,1903.34.