|
|
Literature Cognitive and Concept Formation of “Literature”in Zhou-Qin Dynasty |
CAO Sheng-gao |
Shaanxi Normal University, Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Shaanxi Xi'an, 710119 |
|
|
Abstract The“literature” of four subjects in Confucius(孔门),is often seen as concept formation of “Literature”. However, through the detailedtextual research, we can knowthis “literary” in Confucius is the theory of rites, which is the summary of cultural governance and rites and music education. But the related word“paper”refers toetiquette system. Tsunzi(荀子) advocated “gradually accumulation literature knowledge”(“积文学”), which emphasized the process of humanized tendency. Mo-zi(墨子)collided rites and music, and the “literature” was limited to document or writings, pointed the meaning of “paper” in later ages. Han Fei-zi(韩非子)rejected “literature”, which is a clear understanding on the modification of literature, and positive takeadministrative strategy.
|
Received: 07 March 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (南朝·梁)皇侃.论语集解义疏[M].丛书集成本.上海:商务印书馆,1937.
[2] (清)阮元校刻.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[3] 钱穆.论语新解[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2002.
[4] (宋)朱熹.论语集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[5] (清)王先谦.荀子集解[M].北京:中华书局,1988.
[6] 林桂榛.大儒子弓身份与学说考:兼议儒家弓荀学派天道论之真相[J].齐鲁学刊,2011,(6).
[7] (明)顾炎武撰.(清)黄汝成集释.日知录集释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
[8] 曹胜高.上古礼学的内在层级与逻辑结构[J].河南科技大学学报,2011,(4).
[9] (宋)洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[10] (清)王先慎.韩非子集解[M].北京:中华书局,1998.
[11] 吴毓江.墨子校注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[12] 许维遹.吕氏春秋集释[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[13] 黎翔凤.管子校注[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
[14] (汉)司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[15] (汉)班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962. |
|
|
|