生成式人工智能的著作权例外制度及其构建

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As revolutionary technology and a new, high-quality productive force, generative AI profoundly reshapes the production of expressive content, including text, pictures, music, and video. The copyright exception system provides generative AI with beneficial value on technology enhancement and industry development, including the interest-balancing between participants on generative AI and the copyright holders, the social benefits through generative AI based on full access to information, and the prevention of market failure by incentivizing the licensing of copyrighted works. The institutional foundation of the copyright exception system for generative AI lies in the potential for copyright infringement during data input and content generation, which substantially impacts the development of AI technology as well as its industry. Currently the text-data-mining as the statutory exemption is one institutional trial on the establishment of a copyright exception system of generative AI. Despite such institutional trials operating with the statutory certainty, it still fails to regulate generative AI in the field of commercial practice, as well as the diversity of AI technology. To improve the establishment of copyright exception system on generative AI, one should polish the component of copyright statutory exemption through customized model, establish the rules of behaviors on generative AI based on the characteristics out of copyright exception, and coordinate the copyright licensing with the situation of copyright exception, which ultimately promote the rational and orderly development of generative AI.

Key words： generative artificial intelligence copyright exception generative content statutory exemption systematic construction

Received: 11 April 2025

PACS:

D923.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SUN Yang

Cite this article:

SUN Yang. Copyright Exception and Its Systematic Construction on the Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. , 2025, 42(3): 87-97.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2025/V42/I3/87

[1] (美)杰瑞·卡普兰.人工智能时代[M].李盼译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2017.24.
[2] 吴汉东. 人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规则[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,(5):128-136.
[3] 冯晓青. 著作权法的利益平衡理论研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(6):113-120.
[4] 麦肯锡公司.生成式AI在中国:2万亿美元的经济价值[EB/OL].https://www.mckinsey.com.cn/%E7%94%9F%E6%88%90%E5%BC%8Fai%E5%9C%A8%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%EF%BC%9A2%E4%B8%87%E4%BA%BF%E7%BE%8E%E5%85%83%E7%9A%84%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC/,2025-04-21.
[5] Wendy J.Gordon.Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use:Transaction Costs Have Always Been Part of the Story[J].Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,2003, 50(149):149-198.
[6] Mark A.Lemley.The Economics of Improvement in Inte-llectual Property Law[J].Texas Law Review,1997,75(5):989-1084.
[7] Wendy J.Gordon.Fair Use as Market Failure:A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Pre-decessors[J].Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,1983,30(3):253-326.
[8] (美)威廉·兰德斯,理查德·博斯曼.知识产权法的经济结构[M].金海军译.北京:北京大学出版社,2016.45.
[9] Robert P.Merges.The End of Friction? Property Rights and Contract in the“Newtonian” World of Online Comm-erce[J].Berkeley Technology Law Journal,1997,12(1):115-136.
[10] (美)迈克斯·泰格马克.生命3.0[M].汪婕舒译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2018.91.
[11] Kathy Bowrey.Copyright,Creativity,Big Media and Cultu-ral Value[M].London: Routledge,2021.6-7,112-113.
[12] 支振锋. 生成式人工智能大模型的信息内容治理[J].政法论坛,2023,(4):34-48.
[13] Harvard Law Review Blog Essays.NYT v. OpenAI:The Times’s About-Face[EB/OL].https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2024/04/nyt-v-openai-the-timess-about-face/,2025-04-21.
[14] 张今. 著作权法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.47.
[15] William F.Patry.Party on Fair Use[M].Minnesota:Thom-son West,2012.123.
[16] Margaret A. Boden.AI, Its Nature and Future[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2016.92-93.
[17] (美)雷·库兹韦尔.人工智能的未来[M].盛杨燕译.杭州: 浙江人民出版社,2016.171.
[18] 赵力. 文本与数据挖掘著作权合理使用的域外实践与借鉴[J].图书馆,2022,(3):63-69.
[19] Matthew Sag.Copyright Safety for Generative AI[J].Hou-ston Law Review,2023,61(2):295-348.
[20] Michael W.Carroll.Copyright and the Progress of Scie-nce:Why Text and Data Mining Is Lawful[J].UC Davis Law Review,2019,53(2):893-964.
[21] 林秀芹. 人工智能时代著作权合理使用制度的重塑[J]. 法学研究,2021,(6):170-185.
[22] 十二国著作权法翻译组.十二国著作权法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011.386-387.
[23] UK Government of Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Digital Opportunity:A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth[EB/OL].https://www.gov.uk/govern-ment/publications/modernising-copyright-government-p-olicy-statement-on-consultation,2025-04-21.
[24] 孔祥俊. 网络著作权保护法律理念与裁判方法[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015.264.
[25] 来小鹏. 知识产权法学(第四版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2019.68-69.
[26] 吴汉东. 著作权合理使用制度研究(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.78.
[27] 张平. 人工智能生成内容著作权合法性的制度难题及其解决路径[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2024,(3):18-31.
[28] 丛立先,李泳霖.人工智能文生视频大模型的作品风险、著作权归属及有效治理[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(6):101-111.
[29] 焦和平. 人工智能创作中数据获取与利用的著作权风险及化解路径[J].当代法学,2022,(4):128-140.
[30] 邓朝霞. 网络版权的公共领域研究——以知识共享协议为例[J].电子知识产权,2018,(12):35-45.