|
|
|
| Normative Construction of the Right to Development in the Field of Science and Technology: An International Law Perspective |
| GUO Xiao-ming |
| College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the face of the challenges of building a global community of science and technology (S&T) in the new era, the international development law in the field of S&T advocates sharing-based technological cooperation, and opposes confrontation-oriented technological monopoly. Due to the North-South imbalances in the international S&T development pattern, innovative countries on different levels of development, behind the facade of formal equality in technology sovereignty, encounter high-and-low international technological status and weak-to-strong technological innovation capabilities, particularly in the context of “digital hegemony” today. To break the technological institutional hegemony based on technology monopoly in the post-war international scientific and technological order, the international development law against a background of technological globalization focuses on technology diffusion and technological institutional equality, aiming to build a fairer and more stable international S&T governance mechanism. On the one hand, international development law in S&T considers scientific and technological progress as mankind’s common heritage and ultimate institutional purpose. Thus, the general principles of S&T for development assert that all countries have the right to enjoy the benefits of science and technology in an equal, safe, inclusive and open manner. On the other hand, all countries actually or should enjoy four core rights to development in S&T, including the right to self-determination, the right to peace, the right to commerce, and the right to co-governance. To reshape the S&T order, international development law will play greater normative roles in the coming decades.
|
|
Received: 24 August 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平.在全国科技大会、国家科学技术奖励大会、两院院士大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2024-06-25(002).
[2] 邵沙平.国际法(第3版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2017. 8.
[3] 杨泽伟. 宏观国际法史[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2001. 316.
[4] (南斯拉夫)米兰·布拉伊奇.国际发展法原则[M].陶德海等译.北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1989.45-51.
[5] (英)大卫·艾杰顿.历史的震撼:1900年之后的技术与全球历史[M].朗淑华,迟文成译.上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2008.85-93.
[6] Sundhya Pahuja.Decolonising International Law:Develo-pment, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2011.46.
[7] 李景治,罗天虹等.国际战略学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.165.
[8] Balakrishnan Rajagopal.International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resis-tance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.29.
[9] 习近平.为建设世界科技强国而奋斗——在全国科技创新大会、两院院士大会、中国科协第九次全国代表大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-06-01(002).
[10] 世界银行. 2016年人类发展报告:数字红利[M].胡光宇等译.北京:清华大学出版社,2017.257-290.
[11] Oswaldo De Rivero B.New Economic Order and Inter-national Development Law[M].Guildford:Pergamon Press,1980.1.
[12] 杨泽伟. 新国际经济秩序研究——政治与法律分析[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1998.237-238.
[13] (阿尔及利亚)穆罕默德·贝贾维.争取建立国际经济新秩序[M].欣华,任达译.北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1982.222.
[14] (挪威)J·加尔通.走向新的国际技术秩序[J].肖俊明,朱晓红译.国外社会科学,1980,(1):30-36.
[15] 何予平,秦海菁等.全球化中的技术垄断与技术扩散[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.23-36.
[16] 郑华,聂正楠.科技革命与国际秩序变迁的逻辑探析[J].国际观察,2021,(5):127-156.
[17] 车丕照. 法学视野中的国际经济秩序[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2021.37-38.
[18] (美)迈克尔·奎特.数字殖民主义:美帝国与全球南方的新帝国主义[J].顾海燕译.国外理论动态,2022,(3):112-122.
[19] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.携手构建人类命运共同体:中国的倡议与行动[N].人民日报,2023-09-27(006).
[20] 刘连泰. 信息技术与主权概念[J].中外法学,2015,27(2):505-522.
[21] 李寿平,周忠朴.和平利用生物科技的新挑战及国际法律规制[J].法学杂志,2023,44(2):139-153.
[22] (荷)卡琳·阿特斯,瓦塔邦加贡·托莫.国际法中的发展权:三十年后的新动力?[J].徐云霞译.国际法研究,2017,(1):26-46.
[23] 王春法. 科技全球化与中国科技发展的战略选择[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.517-524.
[24] 汪习根. “二战”后发展权的兴起与实现[J].人权,2015,(4):5-17.
[25] (美)皮埃罗·斯加鲁菲.科技与和平:科技创新如何促进人类信任与互联[M].牛金霞译.北京:中国友谊出版公司,2019.20.
[26] Jayati Ghosh.The Right to Development and Internatio-nal Economic Regimes[A].Arjun Sengupta et al.Reflecti-ons on the Right to Development[C].New Delhi:SAGE Pu-blications Pvt. Ltd,2005.286-287.
[27] 曾婧婧,钟书华.科技治理的模式:一种国际及国内视角[J].科学管理研究,2011,29(1):37-41. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
