|
|
New Agricultural Productivity, New Agricultural Business Entities and Integration of Rural Industries |
ZHAO Hong1, MA Yin-long2 |
1. School of Economics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin, 300221; 2. School of Business, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin, 300221 |
|
|
Abstract New agricultural productivity has injected new impetus into the integrated development of rural industries. This paper conducts a theoretical analysis of how new agricultural productivity drives the integration of rural industries based on Marx’s theory of the four links of social reproduction. The evaluation index system of new agricultural productivity is constructed, and the comprehensive index of new agricultural productivity and rural industry integration development is calculated based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2021. On this basis, an empirical study is conducted to examine the impact and driving mechanism of new agricultural productivity on the integration of rural industries. The results show that: Firstly, the new agriculture productivity drives the integrated development of rural industries with significant direct impact in general. Secondly, new agricultural business entities such as farmer cooperatives, family farms and agricultural leading enterprises are the key paths for the integrated development of rural industries driven by new agricultural productivity, and the mediator effect of family farms and farmer cooperatives is significantly greater than that of leading agricultural enterprises. Thirdly, the driving effect of new agricultural productivity on the integrated development of rural industries in non-agricultural areas is greater than that in rural areas, and the driving effect of new agricultural productivity on the integrated development of rural industries is significant in areas with high rural education level, but not in areas with low rural education level. Fourthly, there is a spatial spillover effect of new agricultural productivity on rural industrial integration within the geographical boundary of 550 km, and the spatial spillover coefficient shows an inverted “U” shaped characteristic of first rising and then decreasing. In the new development paradigm, it is necessary to rationally lay out new agricultural business entities, strengthen the coordination and linkage among new factors of production in the new agricultural productivity, and promote high-quality agricultural development.
|
Received: 16 September 2024
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 乔金亮.用新质生产力引领农业[N].经济日报,2024-03-12(008). [2] 刘昊东. 新质生产力赋能乡村振兴:作用机理与实践路径[J].重庆社会科学,2024,(9):21-31. [3] 高贵现. 新质生产力驱动农业产业链供应链现代化:理论机制与实证检验[J].统计与决策,2024,40(17):18-23. [4] 张力一翔. 新质生产力驱动民族地区乡村产业高质量发展的逻辑与路径[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,41(4):151-160. [5] 王静华,刘人境.乡村振兴的新质生产力驱动逻辑及路径[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(2):16-24. [6] 朱战国,张彤.加快推动家庭农场高质量发展:新质生产力视角[J/OL].农业经济与管理,1-12[2025-01-08].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1564.f.20241210.1609.006.html. [7] 张连刚,陈天庆.新质生产力赋能农民专业合作社高质量发展的理论基础与实践路径[J/OL].农业经济与管理,1-13[2025-01-08].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1564.F.2024 1210.1054.002.html. [8] 丁宁,王贵荣,王福红,等.以新质生产力赋能乡村产业提质增效——基于三个农业龙头企业的跨案例分析[J].新疆社会科学,2024,(5):171-178. [9] 赵雪,石宝峰,盖庆恩,等.以融合促振兴:新型农业经营主体参与产业融合的增收效应[J].管理世界,2023,39(6):86-100. [10] 陈一明,温涛,向栩.数字金融能促进新型农业经营主体的乡村产业融合发展吗?——以湖南省实地调研为例[J].农村经济,2022,(9):89-97. [11] 朱迪,叶林祥.中国农业新质生产力:水平测度与动态演变[J].统计与决策,2024,(9):24-30. [12] 杨军鸽,王琴梅.数字农业新质生产力发展水平的地区差异及收敛性[J/OL].西安财经大学学报,1-15[2025-01-08].https://doi.org/10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.20240516.001. [13] 王欣亮,李想.数智赋能农业新质生产力培育的逻辑与进路——基于马克思主义生产力理论分析[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,54(5):17-27. [14] 张嘉实. 数字经济赋能城乡融合发展研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2023. [15] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022,(5):100-120. [16] 王珏. 新质生产力:一个理论框架与指标体系[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,54(1):35-44. [17] 李彩平,张守夫.中国农业农村新质生产力水平测度及影响因素分析[J].经济问题探索,2024,(12):122-135. [18] 宋佳,张金昌,潘艺.ESG发展对企业新质生产力影响的研究——来自中国A股上市企业的经验证据[J].当代经济管理,2024,46(6):1-11. [19] 余泳泽,刘大勇,宣烨.生产性服务业集聚对制造业生产效率的外溢效应及其衰减边界——基于空间计量模型的实证分析[J].金融研究,2016,(2):23-36. |
|
|
|