家庭能动主义：农村新三代家庭的结构韧性及动力机制

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (549 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Since the reform and opening up, the reproduction of peasant families has gradually been involved in the modernization process. Under the combination of traditional and modern forces, the change path of Chinese rural families has shown greater complexity. Although the independence between the parent family and the child family has increased, and the family structure has a trend of core in form, in the face of the pressure of modernity, there are still extensive and flexible cooperation modes between the generations, forming the structure of the new three-generation family. The new three-generation family is a model in which the father supports the son’s family. The constraints of family resources determine the position of the father generation in the relationship between urban and rural areas so that the new three-generation family can be divided into two forms: the “half-working and half-farming” family and the “old drifting” family. The structure of the new three-generation family breaks through the linear transition path implied by the theory of family modernization, and its structural characteristics of “virtual division and real integration” give the intergenerational integration certain flexibility, which is different from the traditional three-generation family, which is an organic whole based on ethical integration and has significant ethical rigidity. Fundamentally speaking, the new three generations of families emerged from the dynamic adaptation of peasant families to the pressure of modernity, which is the practical expression of family activism. Among them, the family goal defines the direction of the peasant family’s initiative adjustment, while the family resources determine the space of the peasant family’s initiative adjustment, and the external pressure is transformed into the driving force of the new three generations of family reproduction. Family activism provides an important perspective to understand the nature of peasant families in the transition period, which has important theoretical and practical significance.

Key words： family activism urban and rural China family structure family goals household resources

Received: 10 August 2024

PACS:

C913.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Yong-ping

Cite this article:

LI Yong-ping. Family Activism: The Structural Resilience and Dynamic Mechanism of the New Three Generations of Rural Families[J]. , 2025, 42(1): 17-26.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2025/V42/I1/17

[1] (美)古德.家庭[M].魏章玲译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1986.246-248.
[2] 王跃生. 中国农村家庭的核心化分析[J].中国人口科学,2007,(5):36-48.
[3] 曾毅,李伟,梁志武.中国家庭结构的现状、区域差异及变动趋势[J].中国人口科学,1992,(2):1-12.
[4] 张翼. 中国家庭的小型化、核心化与老年空巢化[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2012,(6):87-94.
[5] 贺雪峰. 农村家庭结构的变化及其影响——辽宁大古村调查[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2007,(6):41-46.
[6] 刘燕舞,从核心家庭本位迈向个体本位——关于农村夫妻关系与家庭结构变动的研究[J].中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报,2009,(6):42-46.
[7] 唐灿. 家庭现代化理论及其发展的回顾与述评[J].社会学研究,2010,(3):199-222.
[8] 费孝通. 三论中国家庭结构的变动[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1986,(3):1-5.
[9] 杨菊华,何炤华.社会转型过程中家庭的变迁与延续[J].人口研究,2014,(2):36-51.
[10] (美)阎云翔.私人生活变革:一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系[M].龚小夏译.上海:上海书店出版社,2006.204-208.
[11] 王跃生. 改革开放以来中国农村家庭结构变动分析[J].社会科学研究,2019,(4):95-104.
[12] 王跃生. 直系组家庭:当代家庭形态和代际关系分析的视角[J].中国社会科学,2020,(1):107-132.
[13] 黄宗智. 中国的现代家庭:来自经济史和法律史的视角[J].开放时代,2011,(5):82-105.
[14] 彭希哲,胡湛.当代中国家庭变迁与家庭政策重构[J].中国社会科学,2015,(12):113-132.
[15] 张雪霖. 城市化背景下的农村新三代家庭结构分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(5):120-126.
[16] 李永萍. 功能性家庭:农民家庭现代性适应的实践形态[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,(2):44-60.
[17] 杨菊华,李路路.代际互动与家庭凝聚力——东亚国家和地区比较研究[J].社会学研究,2009,(3):26-53.
[18] 贺雪峰. 农村家庭代际关系的变动及其影响[J].江海学刊,2008,(4):108-113.
[19] 刘守英,王一鸽.从乡土中国到城乡中国——中国转型的乡村变迁视角[J].管理世界,2018,(10):128-146.
[20] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.60-61.
[21] 梁漱溟. 中国文化要义[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003. 95.
[22] 黄宗智. 长江三角洲小农家庭与乡村发展[M].北京:中华书局,2000.11-12.
[23] 朱战辉.城乡中国:乡村社会转型中的结构与秩序[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(1):132-140.
[24] 林辉煌,贺雪峰.中国城乡二元结构:从“剥削型”到“保护型”[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(6):1-10.
[25] 贺雪峰. 三大全国性市场与乡村秩序[J].贵州社会科学,2019,(11):38-43.
[26] 姚俊. “不分家现象”:农村流动家庭的分家实践与家庭再生产——基于结构二重性的分析视角[J].中国农村观察,2013,(5):78-94.
[27] 何惠亭. 代际关系视角下老漂族的城市适应研究[J].前沿,2014,(17):157-161.
[28] 曾毅. 一门十分活跃的人口学分支学科——家庭人口学[J].中国人口科学,1988,(6):58-63.
[29] 孙向晨. 个体主义与家庭主义:新文化运动百年再反思[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2015,(4):62-69.
[30] 阎云翔. 社会自我主义:中国式亲密关系——中国北方农村的代际亲密关系与下行式家庭主义[J].探索与争鸣,2017,(7):4-15.
[31] 康岚. 代差与代同:新家庭主义价值的兴起[J].青年研究,2012,(3):21-29.
[32] 沈毅,周雅静.双系家庭主义、代际关系嵌入与第三代姓氏选择——基于南通地区二孩姓氏“一边一个”“并家婚”案例研究[J].江苏行政学院学报,2021,(4):66-74.